Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Scholarly Independence in Multidisciplinary Learning Environments at Doctoral Level and Beyond

被引:0
作者
Eva M. Brodin
Helen Avery
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Educational Sciences
[2] Stellenbosch University,Centre for Higher and Adult Education
[3] Lund University,Centre for Middle Eastern Studies
来源
Minerva | 2020年 / 58卷
关键词
Doctoral students; Post docs; Collaboration; Scholarly independence; Interdisciplinary; Transdisciplinary;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study is to investigate how patterns of collaboration and scholarly independence are related to early stage researchers’ development in two multidisciplinary learning environments at a Swedish university. Based on interviews with leaders, supervisors, doctoral students, and post docs, results show how early stage researchers’ development is conditioned by their relative positions in time (career stage) and space (geographical and epistemic position). Through the theoretical notions of ‘epistemic living space’ and ‘developmental networks’, four ways of experiencing the multidisciplinary learning environment were distinguished. Overall, the environments provided a world of opportunities, where the epistemic living space entailed many possibilities for cross-disciplinary collaboration and development of scholarly independence among peers. However, depending on the members’ relative positions in time and space, this world became an alien world for the post docs who had been forced to become “over-independent” and find collaborators elsewhere. Moreover, it became an avoided world for absent mono-disciplinary supervisors and students who embodied “non-collective independence”, away from the environments’ community. By contrast, a joint world emerged for doctoral students located in the environment, which promoted their “independent positioning” and collaborative ambitions. Thus, early stage researchers’ collaboration and development of scholarly independence were optimised in a converged learning space, where the temporal and spatial conditions were integrated and equally conducive for learning. Based on these results, the authors provide suggestions for how to improve the integration of scholars who tend to develop away from the community because of their temporal and spatial positions.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 433
页数:24
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Albert Mathieu(2009)Boundary-work in the health research field: Biomedical and clinician scientists’ perceptions of social science research Minerva 47 171-194
[2]  
Laberge Suzanne(2010)Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study Studies in Higher Education 35 807-827
[3]  
Hodges Brian D(2011)Student socialization in interdisciplinary doctoral education Higher Education 62 741-755
[4]  
Baker Vicki L(2014)“Leave your discipline at the door”: Matching expectations for interdisciplinary collaboration among faculty members Higher Education in Review 11 1-29
[5]  
Lattuca Lisa R(2010)Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes The Review of Higher Education 34 61-84
[6]  
Boden Daniel(2014)A roadmap for forming successful interdisciplinary education research collaborations: A reflective approach Higher Education Research & Development 33 198-211
[7]  
Borrego Maura(2012)Promoting interdisciplinary education—The Vienna Doctoral Programme on Water Resource Systems Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 457-472
[8]  
Newswander Lynita K(2012)Why do scientists migrate? A diffusion model Minerva 50 471-491
[9]  
Boden Daniel(2008)Disciplinary and interdisciplinary affiliations of experienced researchers Higher Education 56 423-438
[10]  
McNair Lisa D(2016)Critical and creative thinking nexus: Learning experiences of doctoral students Studies in Higher Education 41 971-989