Indocyanine green perfusion assessment of the gastric conduit in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

[1] Schröder W(2019)Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the EsoBenchmark database Ann Surg 270 820-826

[2] Raptis DA(2015)Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study Ann Surg 261 702-707

[3] Schmidt HM(2013)Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database Ann Thorac Surg 96 1919-1926

[4] Gisbertz SS(2015)Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy Ann Surg 262 74-78

[5] Moons J(2015)Conduit vascular evaluation is associated with reduction in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy J Gastrointest Surg 19 806-812

[6] Asti E(2009)The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience Ann Surg 250 187-196

[7] Luyer MDP(2004)Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205-3255

[8] Hölscher AH(2020)Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases Surg Endosc 34 3243-2010

[9] Schneider PM(2019)Outcomes of open versus minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis of NSQIP database Ann Surg Oncol 26 2001-126

[10] van Berge Henegouwen MI(2016)Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers Surg Endosc 31 119-379

[1] Schröder W(2019)Anastomotic techniques and associated morbidity in total minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy: results from the EsoBenchmark database Ann Surg 270 820-826

[2] Raptis DA(2015)Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study Ann Surg 261 702-707

[3] Schmidt HM(2013)Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database Ann Thorac Surg 96 1919-1926

[4] Gisbertz SS(2015)Intraoperative assessment of perfusion of the gastric graft and correlation with anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy Ann Surg 262 74-78

[5] Moons J(2015)Conduit vascular evaluation is associated with reduction in anastomotic leak after esophagectomy J Gastrointest Surg 19 806-812

[6] Asti E(2009)The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience Ann Surg 250 187-196

[7] Luyer MDP(2004)Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205-3255

[8] Hölscher AH(2020)Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases Surg Endosc 34 3243-2010

[9] Schneider PM(2019)Outcomes of open versus minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity-score matched analysis of NSQIP database Ann Surg Oncol 26 2001-126

[10] van Berge Henegouwen MI(2016)Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers Surg Endosc 31 119-379