The effect of phase angle and wing spacing on tandem flapping wings

被引:0
作者
Timothy M. Broering
Yong-Sheng Lian
机构
[1] University of Louisville,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
Acta Mechanica Sinica | 2012年 / 28卷
关键词
Tandem; Flapping; Airfoils; Micro air vehicle; Caculational fluid dynamics (CFD); Overlapping grids;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a tandem wing configuration, the hindwing often operates in the wake of the forewing and, hence, its performance is affected by the vortices shed by the forewing. Changes in the phase angle between the flapping motions of the fore and the hind wings, as well as the spacing between them, can affect the resulting vortex/wing and vortex/vortex interactions. This study uses 2D numerical simulations to investigate how these changes affect the leading dege vortexes (LEV) generated by the hindwing and the resulting effect on the lift and thrust coefficients as well as the efficiencies. The tandem wing configuration was simulated using an incompressible Navier-Stokes solver at a chord-based Reynolds number of 5 000. A harmonic single frequency sinusoidal oscillation consisting of a combined pitch and plunge motion was used for the flapping wing kinematics at a Strouhal number of 0.3. Four different spacings ranging from 0.1 chords to 1 chord were tested at three different phase angles, 0°, 90° and 180°. It was found that changes in the spacing and phase angle affected the timing of the interaction between the vortex shed from the forewing and the hindwing. Such an interaction affects the LEV formation on the hindwing and results in changes in aerodynamic force production and efficiencies of the hindwing. It is also observed that changing the phase angle has a similar effect as changing the spacing. The results further show that at different spacings the peak force generation occurs at different phase angles, as do the peak efficiencies.
引用
收藏
页码:1557 / 1571
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] May M. L.(1991)Dragonfly flight: Power requirements at high speed and acceleration The Journal of Experimental Biology 158 325-342
  • [2] Reavis M. A.(1988)Aerodynamic forces produced by a dragonfly AIAA Journal 88–0330 1-13
  • [3] Luttges M. W.(1965)Der Wellpropeller, ein Neuer Antrieb fuer Wasser-, Land-, und Luftfahrzeuge Zeitschrift fur Flugwissenschaften 13 427-479
  • [4] Schmidt W.(1996)Thrust generation due to airfoil flapping AIAA Journal 34 324-331
  • [5] Tuncer I. H.(1984)Unusual phase relationships between forewings and hindwings in flying dragonflies Journal of Experimental Biology 109 379-383
  • [6] Platzer M. F.(1989)Kinematic analysis of symmetrical flight maneuvers of Odonata The Journal of Experimental Biology 144 13-42
  • [7] Alexander D. E.(1988)Flight performance of a dragonfly The Journal of Experimental Biology 137 221-252
  • [8] Ruppell G.(2004)Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady flight-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack The Journal of Experimental Biology 207 4299-4323
  • [9] Azuma A.(1979)The unsteady quasi-vortex-lattice method with application to animal propulsion Journal of Fluid Mechanics 93 747-765
  • [10] Watanabe T.(2008)Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl J. R. Soc Interface 5 1303-1307