The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

被引:0
作者
Burkhard Helpap
Lars Egevad
机构
[1] Academic Hospital of the University of Freiburg,Department of Pathology, Center of Uropathology, General Hospital Hegau
[2] Karolinska Hospital,Bodensee
[3] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),Klinikum Singen
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2006年 / 449卷
关键词
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate; Modified Gleason grading; Core needle biopsy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
At an International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in 2005, the Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma underwent its first major revision. Gleason pattern 4 now includes most cribriform patterns and also fused and poorly formed glands. Our aims were to compare the grade distributions and assess the agreement between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens for the modified and conventional Gleason grading. More than 3,000 radical prostatectomy (RP), needle biopsies (NB) and transurethral resection specimens were assigned modified Gleason score (GS). In NB, modified GS 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7a were almost equally common, while in RP, 3 + 4 = 7a was most common followed by 4 + 3 = 7b. After application of the modified GS on NB, a substantial shift in GS distribution occurred: The proportion of GS 6 and 7 were 48 and 26%, respectively, with conventional Gleason grading as compared to 22 and 68%, respectively, with modified grading. In 368 men, the agreement between NB and RP with a modified GS 6, 7a, 7b and 8–10 in NB was 28, 88, 68 and 64–100%, respectively. The overall agreement improved from 58 to 72% (p < 0.001) compared to conventional GS. The higher agreement with modified Gleason grading may facilitate therapeutic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Significance of the craniocaudal distribution of cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Ishii, Junichiro ;
Ohori, Makoto ;
Scardino, Peter ;
Tsuboi, Toshiki ;
Slawin, Kevin ;
Wheeler, Thomas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (09) :817-821
[32]   The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen [J].
Guo, Cheng-hao ;
Geng, Yin-shuai ;
Zhu, Liang-yong ;
Ding, Xue-fei ;
Luan, Yang .
BJUI COMPASS, 2025, 6 (03)
[33]   Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score Correlation in Heterogenous Tumors Proposal for a Composite Gleason Score [J].
Arias-Stella, Javier A. ;
Shah, Alpa B. ;
Montoya-Cerrillo, Diego ;
Williamson, Sean R. ;
Gupta, Nilesh S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 39 (09) :1213-1218
[34]   Significance of the Percentage of Gleason Pattern 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Adverse Pathology on Radical Prostatectomy: Application in Active Surveillance [J].
Ordner, Jeffrey ;
Flaifel, Abdallah ;
Serrano, Antonio ;
Graziano, Rebecca ;
Melamed, Jonathan ;
Deng, Fang-Ming .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2023, 160 (01) :35-40
[35]   Histopathological Ratios to Predict Gleason Score Agreement between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Fiorentino, Vincenzo ;
Martini, Maurizio ;
Dell'Aquila, Marco ;
Musarra, Teresa ;
Orticelli, Ersilia ;
Larocca, Luigi Maria ;
Rossi, Ernesto ;
Totaro, Angelo ;
Pinto, Francesco ;
Lenci, Niccolo ;
Di Paola, Valerio ;
Manfredi, Riccardo ;
Bassi, Pier Francesco ;
Pierconti, Francesco .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 11 (01)
[36]   Predictors of Gleason Grading Group Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients From Transperineal Biopsy After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Zhou, Ling ;
Xu, Li-long ;
Zheng, Lin-lin ;
Chen, Chao ;
Xu, Li ;
Zeng, Ji-ling ;
Li, Shi-yan .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) :2838-2847
[37]   Minimal carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens: Diagnostic features and radical prostatectomy follow-up [J].
Thorson, P ;
Vollmer, RT ;
Arcangeli, C ;
Keetch, DW ;
Humphrey, PA .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 11 (06) :543-551
[38]   Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6) [J].
Kulkarni, Jagdeesh N. ;
Valsangkar, Rohan S. ;
Jadhav, Yogesh R. ;
Singh, Dayal Partap .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 7 (04) :459-462
[39]   Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens [J].
Nagpal, Kunal ;
Foote, Davis ;
Tan, Fraser ;
Liu, Yun ;
Chen, Po-Hsuan Cameron ;
Steiner, David F. ;
Manoj, Naren ;
Olson, Niels ;
Smith, Jenny L. ;
Mohtashamian, Arash ;
Peterson, Brandon ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Evans, Andrew J. ;
Sweet, Joan W. ;
Cheung, Carol ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus ;
Sangoi, Ankur R. ;
Zhou, Ming ;
Allan, Robert ;
Humphrey, Peter A. ;
Hipp, Jason D. ;
Gadepalli, Krishna ;
Corrado, Greg S. ;
Peng, Lily H. ;
Stumpe, Martin C. ;
Mermel, Craig H. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (09) :1372-1380
[40]   The transverse and vertical distribution of prostate cancer in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Zhipeng Mai ;
Zhien Zhou ;
Weigang Yan ;
Yu Xiao ;
Yi Zhou ;
Zhiyong Liang ;
Zhigang Ji ;
Hanzhong Li .
BMC Cancer, 18