The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens

被引:0
|
作者
Burkhard Helpap
Lars Egevad
机构
[1] Academic Hospital of the University of Freiburg,Department of Pathology, Center of Uropathology, General Hospital Hegau
[2] Karolinska Hospital,Bodensee
[3] International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC),Klinikum Singen
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2006年 / 449卷
关键词
Adenocarcinoma of the prostate; Modified Gleason grading; Core needle biopsy; Radical prostatectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
At an International Society of Urological Pathology consensus conference in 2005, the Gleason grading system for prostatic carcinoma underwent its first major revision. Gleason pattern 4 now includes most cribriform patterns and also fused and poorly formed glands. Our aims were to compare the grade distributions and assess the agreement between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens for the modified and conventional Gleason grading. More than 3,000 radical prostatectomy (RP), needle biopsies (NB) and transurethral resection specimens were assigned modified Gleason score (GS). In NB, modified GS 3 + 3 = 6 and 3 + 4 = 7a were almost equally common, while in RP, 3 + 4 = 7a was most common followed by 4 + 3 = 7b. After application of the modified GS on NB, a substantial shift in GS distribution occurred: The proportion of GS 6 and 7 were 48 and 26%, respectively, with conventional Gleason grading as compared to 22 and 68%, respectively, with modified grading. In 368 men, the agreement between NB and RP with a modified GS 6, 7a, 7b and 8–10 in NB was 28, 88, 68 and 64–100%, respectively. The overall agreement improved from 58 to 72% (p < 0.001) compared to conventional GS. The higher agreement with modified Gleason grading may facilitate therapeutic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:622 / 627
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The significance of modified Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Helpap, Burkhard
    Egevad, Lars
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2006, 449 (06) : 622 - 627
  • [2] The effect of modified Gleason grading on the score concordance between the Gleason scores of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in prostatic carcinoma
    Ozok, Hakki Ugur
    Oktay, Murat
    Sagnak, Levent
    Karakoyunlu, Nihat
    Ersoy, Hamit
    Alper, Murat
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 36 (04): : 333 - 338
  • [3] Correlation of modified Gleason grading with pT stage of prostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
    Helpap, Burkhard
    Egevad, Lars
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2008, 30 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [4] Is There a Concordance Between the Gleason Scores of Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Prostatic Carsinoma?
    Ozgor, Faruk
    Kucuktopcu, Onur
    Sahan, Murat
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Berberoglu, Ahmet Yalcin
    Sarilar, Omer
    Savun, Metin
    Gurbuz, Zafer Gokhan
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2016, 54 (01): : 32 - 35
  • [5] Discrepancy between Gleason scores of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
    Köksal, IT
    Özcan, F
    Kadioglu, TC
    Esen, T
    Kiliçaslan, I
    Tunç, M
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2000, 37 (06) : 670 - 674
  • [6] Gleason Score Correlation Between Prostate Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Ozturk, Erdem
    Yikilmaz, Taha Numan
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2018, 17 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [7] Gleason scores in prostate needle biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in prostatic adenocarcinoma: A correlation study
    Awang, Asmawiza
    Isa, Nurismah Md
    Yunus, Rosna
    Shah, Shamsul Azhar
    Pauzi, Suria Hayati Md
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 41 (03) : 253 - 257
  • [8] Comparison of Gleason Scores in Specimens of Transrectal Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy
    Tuygun, Can
    Demirel, Fuat
    Yigitbasi, Orhan
    Bozkurt, Halil
    Bakirtas, Hasan
    Imamoglu, Abdurrahim
    UHOD-ULUSLARARASI HEMATOLOJI-ONKOLOJI DERGISI, 2009, 19 (03): : 129 - 133
  • [9] Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy
    Muentener, Michael
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Hernandez, David J.
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    Mangold, Leslie
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Nielsen, Mattheiv E.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 53 (04) : 767 - 776
  • [10] Downgrading of biopsy based Gleason score in prostatectomy specimens
    Treurniet, Kilian M.
    Trudel, Dominique
    Sykes, Jenna
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Finelli, Antonio
    Van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 313 - 318