Validation of the Oncomine™ focus panel for next-generation sequencing of clinical tumour samples

被引:0
作者
Hannah L. Williams
Kathy Walsh
Austin Diamond
Anca Oniscu
Zandra C. Deans
机构
[1] Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh,UKNEQAS for Molecular Genetics
[2] Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh,NHS Lothian, Department of Molecular Pathology
[3] University of St Andrews,NHS Lothian, Molecular Genetics
[4] School of Medicine,undefined
[5] Western General Hospital,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2018年 / 473卷
关键词
Next-generation sequencing; Molecular pathology; Clinical validation; FFPE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a diverse range of targets is expanding, increasing the need for multiplexed analysis of both DNA and RNA. However, translation into daily use requires a rigorous and comprehensive validation strategy. The aim of this clinical validation was to assess the performance of the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (IonPGM™) and validate the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion panels for clinical application in solid tumour testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Using a mixture of routine FFPE and reference material across a variety of tissue and specimen types, we sequenced 86 and 31 samples on the Oncomine™ Focus DNA and RNA Fusion assays, respectively. This validation considered a number of parameters including the clinical robustness of the bioinformatics pipeline for variant detection and interpretation. The Oncomine™ Focus DNA assay had a sample and variant-based sensitivity of 99.1 and 97.1%, respectively, and an assay specificity of 100%. The Oncomine™ Focus Fusion panel had a good sensitivity and specificity based upon the samples assessed, however requires further validation to confirm findings due to limited sample numbers. We observed a good sequencing performance based upon amplicon, gene (hotspot variants within gene) and sample specific analysis with 92% of clinical samples obtaining an average amplicon coverage above 500X. Detection of some indels was challenging for the routine IonReporter™ workflow; however, the addition of NextGENe® software improved indel identification demonstrating the importance of both bench and bioinformatic validation. With an increasing number of clinically actionable targets requiring a variety of methodologies, NGS provides a cost-effective and time-saving methodology to assess multiple targets across different modalities. We suggest the use of multiple analysis software to ensure identification of clinically applicable variants.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 503
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[11]  
Thorvaldsdottir H(2013)DNA qualification workflow for next generation sequencing of histopathological samples PLoS One 8 e62692-439
[12]  
Winckler W(2015)Clinical validation of targeted next generation sequencing for Colon and Lung cancers PLoS One 10 e0138245-undefined
[13]  
Guttman M(1991)PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues: effects of fixative and fixation time Am J Clin Pathol 95 117-undefined
[14]  
Lander ES(2013)Shining a light on dark sequencing: characterising errors in ion torrent PGM data PLoS Comput Biol 9 e1003031-undefined
[15]  
Getz G(2014)Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes BMC Genomics 15 516-undefined
[16]  
Robin JD(2012)Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms Nat Biotechnol 30 434-undefined
[17]  
Ludlow AT(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[18]  
LaRanger R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[19]  
Wright WE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[20]  
Shay JW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined