The evolution, devolution and distribution of UK Biometric Imaginaries

被引:0
作者
Christopher James Lawless
机构
[1] Durham University,Department of Sociology
来源
BioSocieties | 2022年 / 17卷
关键词
Biometric data; Forensic science; Sociotechnical imaginaries; Policy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article critically examines UK biometric policymaking by charting the bodies identified by the 2018 Home Office Biometric Strategy as playing key roles in the oversight of biometric data used in law enforcement and other related functions. The article argues that oversight actors are embedded in biometric imaginaries promoted by the UK Home Office and the devolved Scottish administration. By mapping oversight of UK biometrics policy together with developments in Scotland, the article challenges sociotechnical imaginaries studies which assume the power of national governments to project dominant, cohesive and instrumental visions. The article peels away that image to reveal UK biometric policy as located within a patchwork in which embedded commissioners, regulators and advisors challenge biometric imaginaries through interpretive flexibility and standpoint. By identifying technical, operational, legislative and ethical issues, these actors challenge the UK government imaginary and act as channels of critique between it and wider stakeholder communities. The article further challenges assumptions concerning the cohesion of national imaginaries by highlighting a diverging approach to biometric governance in Scotland. The article uses these observations to sketch a means to further characterise the notion of the biometric imaginary and to address biometric policymaking more widely.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 526
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Amankwaa AO(2019)The UK National DNA Database: Implementation of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Forensic Science International 284 117-128
[2]  
McCartney C(2006)The sociology of expectations in science and technology Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 285-298
[3]  
Borup M(1998)Witnessing identification: Latent fingerprint evidence and expert knowledge Social Studies of Science 28 687-712
[4]  
Brown N(2020)The insides and outsides of parliamentary politics: Introduction to a special issue of Social Studies of Science on parliamentary practices Social Studies of Science. 50 245-251
[5]  
Konrad K(2018)Whose and what futures? Navigating the contested coproduction of Thailand’s energy sociotechnical imaginaries Energy Research & Social Science 35 48-56
[6]  
Van Lente H(2015)The biometric imaginary: Bureaucratic technopolitics in post-apartheid welfare Journal of Southern African Studies 41 815-833
[7]  
Cole SA(2011)The building blocks of forensic science and law: Recent work on DNA profiling (and photo comparison) Social Studies of Science 41 127-152
[8]  
Dẚnyi E(2019)Governance through expectations: Examining the long-term policy relevance of smart meters in the United Kingdom Futures 109 153-169
[9]  
Delina LL(2009)Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the US and South Korea Minerva 47 119-146
[10]  
Donovan K(2014)The politics of human embryonic stem cell research in South Korea: Contesting national sociotechnical imaginaries Science as Culture 23 293-319