Tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons using Rigidfix femoral fixation and Intrafix tibial fixation

被引:0
作者
Nam-Hong Choi
Jung-Hoon Lee
Kyung-Mo Son
Brian N. Victoroff
机构
[1] Eulji Medical Center,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] United Hospital,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[3] Case Western Reserve University College of Medicine,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
来源
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | 2010年 / 18卷
关键词
Tibial tunnel; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring tendon; Rigidfix; Intrafix;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to evaluate tibial tunnel widening prospectively after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon grafts using Rigidfix (DePuy Mitek, Raynham, MA) femoral fixation and Intrafix (DePuy Mitek) tibial fixation. Fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with a minimum of 2 years’ postoperative evaluation were reviewed. On the anterior–posterior (AP) and lateral radiographs, the diameter of the tibial tunnel was measured at proximal, middle, and distal positions, and the shape of the tibial tunnels were classified. Tunnel widening was defined as widening of greater than 2 mm. Group I was defined as cases with no tunnel widening, and group II was defined as cases with tunnel widening. Postoperative laxity evaluations were performed using Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and instrumented laxity testing using the KT-1000 arthrometer. On the AP radiographs, the average diameter of the tibial tunnel increased 8.8% at 6 months and 8.5% at 12 months postoperatively compared to the immediate postoperative day. On the lateral radiographs, the average diameter of the tibial tunnel increased 7.2% at 6 months and 8.1% at 12 months year postoperatively compared to the immediate postoperative day. The tunnel shape evaluation revealed predominantly linear type in 53 patients (95%). Group I was 42 patients (75%), and group II was 14 (25%). The average KT-1000 measurement was 1.0 ± 1.8 mm in group I and 2.1 ± 2.8 mm in group II (n.s.). The Lachman and pivot-shift tests showed no significant differences between the two groups. In conclusion, hamstring ACL reconstruction using Rigidfix and Intrafix fixation showed less widening of the tibial tunnels than observed in previously published studies.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 97
页数:5
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Charlton WP(2003)Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation Am J Sports Med 31 518-521
[2]  
Randolph DA(1995)Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons Am J Sports Med 23 706-714
[3]  
Lemos S(1997)Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7 138-145
[4]  
Shields CL(2001)Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9 86-91
[5]  
Yasuda K(1997)Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5 234-238
[6]  
Tsujino J(1996)Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4 2-8
[7]  
Ohkoshi Y(2004)Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery Am J Sports Med 32 543-549
[8]  
Tanabe Y(2004)Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading Am J Sports Med 32 641-649
[9]  
Kaneda K(2003)The fixation strength of six hamstring graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part II: Tibial site Am J Sports Med 31 182-188
[10]  
Clatworthy MG(2005)Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study Arthroscopy 21 1337-1341