Monetary incentives to avoid deforestation under the Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD)+ climate change mitigation scheme in Tanzania

被引:0
作者
Meley M. Araya
Ole Hofstad
机构
[1] Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU),Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management
来源
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2016年 / 21卷
关键词
Agricultural rent; Forest rent; Miombo woodland; Montane forest; Opportunity cost; REDD+; Sustainable harvest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper estimates and compares the level of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) payments required to compensate for the opportunity costs (OCs) of stopping the conversion of montane forest and miombo woodlands into cropland in two agro-ecological zones in Morogoro Region in Tanzania. Data collected from 250 households were used for OC estimation. REDD+ payment was estimated as the net present value (NPV) of agricultural rent and forest rent during land clearing, minus net returns from sustainable wood harvest, divided by the corresponding reduction in carbon stock. The median compensation required to protect the current carbon stock in the two vegetation types ranged from USD 1 tCO2e−1 for the montane forest to USD 39 tCO2e−1 for the degraded miombo woodlands, of which up to 70 % and 16 %, respectively, were for compensating OCs from forest rent during land clearing. The figures were significantly higher when the cost of farmers’ own labor was not taken into account in NPV calculations. The results also highlighted that incentives in the form of sustainable harvests could offset up to 55 % of the total median OC to protect the montane forest and up to 45 % to protect the miombo woodlands, depending on the wage rates. The findings suggest that given the possible factors that can potentially affect estimates of REDD+ payments, avoiding deforestation of the montane forest would be feasible under the REDD+ scheme. However, implementation of the policy in villages around the miombo area would require very high compensation levels.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 443
页数:22
相关论文
共 203 条
  • [1] Angelsen A(1999)Why do farmers expand their land into forests? Theories and evidence from Tanzania Environ Dev Econ 4 313-331
  • [2] Shitindi EFK(1997)The economics of tropical forest land use options Land Econ 73 174-195
  • [3] Aarrestad J(2008)Reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation in Cameroon—assessing costs and benefits Ecol Econ 68 336-344
  • [4] Barbier EB(2011)Reducing carbon emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: issues for policy design and implementation Environ Dev Econ 16 357-360
  • [5] Burgess JC(2002)The Uluguru Mountains of eastern Tanzania: the effect of forest loss on biodiversity Oryx 36 140-152
  • [6] Bellassen V(2010)Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges Oryx 44 339-351
  • [7] Gitz V(2009)REDD in the red: palm oil could undermine carbon payment schemes Conserv Lett 2 67-73
  • [8] Bosetti V(2004)Stand biomass and volume estimation for Miombo woodlands at Kitulangalo, Morogoro, Tanzania South Forest J Forest Sci 200 59-70
  • [9] Rose SK(2010)A little REDD model to quickly compare possible baseline and policy scenarios for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15 53-69
  • [10] Burgess N(2005)Activity choice, labor allocation, and forest use in Malawi Land Econ 81 503-517