Use of low-fidelity models with machine-learning error correction for well placement optimization

被引:0
|
作者
Haoyu Tang
Louis J. Durlofsky
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Energy Resources Engineering
来源
Computational Geosciences | 2022年 / 26卷
关键词
Well placement optimization; Reservoir simulation; Error model; Multifidelity; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well placement optimization is commonly performed using population-based global stochastic search algorithms. These optimizations are computationally expensive due to the large number of multiphase flow simulations that must be conducted. In this work, we present an optimization framework in which these simulations are performed with low-fidelity (LF) models. These LF models are constructed from the underlying high-fidelity (HF) geomodel using a global transmissibility upscaling procedure. Tree-based machine-learning methods, specifically random forest and light gradient boosting machine, are applied to estimate the error in objective function value (in this case net present value, NPV) associated with the LF models. In the offline (preprocessing) step, preliminary optimizations are performed using LF models, and a clustering procedure is applied to select a representative set of 100–150 well configurations to use for training. HF simulation is then performed for these configurations, and the tree-based models are trained using an appropriate set of features. In the online (runtime) step, optimization with LF models, with the machine-learning correction, is conducted. Differential evolution is used for all optimizations. Results are presented for two example cases involving the placement of vertical wells in 3D bimodal channelized geomodels. We compare the performance of our procedure to optimization using HF models. In the first case, 25 optimization runs are performed with both approaches. Our method provides an overall speedup factor of 46 relative to optimization using HF models, with the best-case NPV within 1% of the HF result. In the second case fewer HF optimization runs are conducted (consistent with actual practice), and the overall speedup factor with our approach is about 8. In this case, the best-case NPV from our procedure exceeds the HF result by 3.8%.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1206
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Hybrid derivative-free technique and effective machine learning surrogate for nonlinear constrained well placement and production optimization
    Nasir, Yusuf
    Yu, Wei
    Sepehrnoori, Kamy
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 186
  • [22] Supervised Machine-Learning Algorithm using Low Data Sets: Flow Chemistry Optimization of the Key Urea Moiety Construction in Larotrectinib
    Thalla, Haripriya
    Uma Jayaraman, Varshini
    Uppada, Maheshkumar
    Eda, Vishnuvardhan Reddy
    Sen, Saikat
    Bandichhor, Rakeshwar
    Oruganti, Srinivas
    ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 28 (07) : 2552 - 2560
  • [23] Development and optimization of machine learning models for estimation of mechanical properties of linear low-density polyethylene
    Shirazian, Saeed
    Huynh, Thoa
    Sarkar, Shaheen M.
    Zare, Masoud Habibi
    POLYMER TESTING, 2024, 137
  • [24] A noninvasive prenatal test pipeline with a well-generalized machine-learning approach for accurate fetal trisomy detection using low-depth short sequence data
    Huang, Qiongrong
    Zhu, Jianjiang
    Lu, Jianbo
    Fang, Qiaojun
    Qi, Hong
    Tu, Bin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 249
  • [25] Spatial Modeling of Daily PM2.5, NO2, and CO Concentrations Measured by a Low-Cost Sensor Network: Comparison of Linear, Machine Learning, and Hybrid Land Use Models
    Jain, Sakshi
    Presto, Albert A.
    Zimmerman, Naomi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 55 (13) : 8631 - 8641
  • [26] Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools for Assisting Low-Carbon Architectural Design: Merging the Use of Machine Learning, Large Language Models, and Building Information Modeling for Life Cycle Assessment Tool Development
    Ploszaj-Mazurek, Mateusz
    Rynska, Elzbieta
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (12)