A Comparison Study of Three Posterior Fixation Strategies in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Lumbar for the Treatment of Degenerative Diseases

[1] Harms J(1982)A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl) Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120 343-7

[2] Rolinger H(2006)Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A biomechanical analysis Spine J 6 78-85

[3] Slucky AV(1989)1989 Volvo award in basic science Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14 919-26

[4] Brodke DS(1991)The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density A canine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 S190-7

[5] Bachus KN(2004)Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 1938-44

[6] Droge JA(1992)Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: Unilateral versus bilateral J Spinal Disord 5 39-49

[7] Braun JT(2000)Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 1843-7

[8] McAfee PC(2014)Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: A prospective randomised study Int Orthop 38 111-6

[9] Farey ID(2012)Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases Spine J 12 209-15

[10] Sutterlin CE(2017)Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical procedures in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 49 91-5

[1] Harms J(1982)A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl) Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 120 343-7

[2] Rolinger H(2006)Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A biomechanical analysis Spine J 6 78-85

[3] Slucky AV(1989)1989 Volvo award in basic science Device-related osteoporosis with spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 14 919-26

[4] Brodke DS(1991)The effect of spinal implant rigidity on vertebral bone density A canine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 S190-7

[5] Bachus KN(2004)Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: Review of the literature Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29 1938-44

[6] Droge JA(1992)Isolated L4-L5 fusions using the variable screw placement system: Unilateral versus bilateral J Spinal Disord 5 39-49

[7] Braun JT(2000)Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 1843-7

[8] McAfee PC(2014)Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: A prospective randomised study Int Orthop 38 111-6

[9] Farey ID(2012)Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases Spine J 12 209-15

[10] Sutterlin CE(2017)Biomechanical evaluation of different surgical procedures in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 49 91-5