Dose levels at coronary CT angiography—a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT

[1] Schoepf UJ(2007)Coronary CT angiography Radiology 244 48-63

[2] Zwerner PL(2006)Computed tomography coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 48 1919-1928

[3] Savino G(2006)Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation 114 1761-1791

[4] Herzog C(2006)ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging,

[5] Kerl JM(2007)Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study Radiology 245 577-583

[6] Costello P(2008)Dual-energy CT angiography of the lung in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: initial results Rofo 180 879-883

[7] Achenbach S(2007)Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience Eur Radiol 17 1510-1517

[8] Budoff MJ(2010)Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience Radiology 254 145-153

[9] Achenbach S(2007)Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality-reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings Radiology 242 832-839

[10] Blumenthal RS(2007)16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 115-120

[1] Schoepf UJ(2007)Coronary CT angiography Radiology 244 48-63

[2] Zwerner PL(2006)Computed tomography coronary angiography J Am Coll Cardiol 48 1919-1928

[3] Savino G(2006)Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology Circulation 114 1761-1791

[4] Herzog C(2006)ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging,

[5] Kerl JM(2007)Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study Radiology 245 577-583

[6] Costello P(2008)Dual-energy CT angiography of the lung in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: initial results Rofo 180 879-883

[7] Achenbach S(2007)Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience Eur Radiol 17 1510-1517

[8] Budoff MJ(2010)Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience Radiology 254 145-153

[9] Achenbach S(2007)Circle of Willis at CT angiography: dose reduction and image quality-reducing tube voltage and increasing tube current settings Radiology 242 832-839

[10] Blumenthal RS(2007)16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose AJR Am J Roentgenol 188 115-120