Comparison of Cervical Length Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Bishop Score in Predicting Response to Labor Induction

被引:19
作者
Khandelwal R. [1 ]
Patel P. [2 ]
Pitre D. [2 ]
Sheth T. [2 ]
Maitra N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UCMS College, GTB Hospital, New Delhi
[2] Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College, Baroda, Anandpura, Baroda
关键词
Bishop score; Induction active phase interval; Labor induction; Transvaginal cervical length;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-017-1027-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aims to compare the value of the Bishop score and cervical length measurement by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting active labor within 6 h, induction-to-delivery interval, and the duration of active labor and to estimate the most useful cutoff points for the two methods. Methods: This is a prospective comparative study of Bishop score and cervical length measured by transvaginal sonography on 62 nulliparous subjects who underwent induction of labor. Results: The Bishop score of the subjects ranged from two to seven (2–7). The mean Bishop in this study population was 4.37 + 1.23. The mean cervical length in this study was 25.59 + 6.07. Bishop score was highly significant (P value < 0.0001) in predicting active phase of labor as compared to cervical length (P = 0.004). The best cutoff value for Bishop score to predict induction of labor within 6 h was more than 4 with sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 79%. Similarly, best cutoff value for cervical length to predict induction of labor within 6 h was less than or equal to 25 mm with sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 70%. Bishop score was more significant (P = 0.001) in predicting induction-to-delivery interval within 12 h as compared to cervical length (P = 0.01). Conclusion: The Bishop score was superior in predicting the response to induction as compared to the cervical length measured by transvaginal ultrasonography. © 2017, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Pandis G.K., Papageorghiou A.T., Ramanathan V.G., Et al., Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 18, pp. 623-628, (2001)
[2]  
Banu S., Jaysahree V., Latha K., Study of comparison of transvaginal cervical length and modified Bishop’s score in predicting the mode of delivery at term following induction of labor, IJCRD, 4, 2, pp. 134-140, (2016)
[3]  
Trial F.O.L.C.R.O.M., Foley Catheter in Rupture of Membranes (FOLCROM), Online
[4]  
Bahadori F., Ayatollahi H., Naghavi-Behzad M., Et al., Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks, Med Ultrasonogr, 15, 3, (2013)
[5]  
Cengiz H., Yalvac S., Yavuzcan A., Kandemir O., Haberal A., Prediction of successful induction of labour with dinoprostone in a homogeneous group of patients, S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol, 18, 1, pp. 19-22, (2012)
[6]  
Bastani P., Hamdi K., Abasalizadeh F., Et al., Transvaginal ultrasonography compared with Bishop score for predicting cesarean section after induction of Labour, Int J Womens Health, 3, pp. 277-280, (2011)
[7]  
Park K.H., Kim S.N., Lee S.Y., Et al., Comparison between sonographic cervical length and Bishop score in preinduction cervical assessment: a randomized trial, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 38, 2, pp. 198-204, (2011)
[8]  
Kanwar S.N., Reena P., Priya B.K., A comparative study of trans vaginal sonography and modified Bishop score for cervical assessment before induction of labour, Sch J App Med Sci, 3, 6B, pp. 2284-2288, (2015)
[9]  
Chandran S.S., Shivan H., Bharathi D., Et al., Comparison of cervical characteristics assessed by TVUS (with and without saline) with digital method in prediction of labour induction outcome: a prospective study, Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol, 4, 3, pp. 634-640, (2015)
[10]  
Kehila M., Bougmiza I., Ben Hmid R., Et al., Bishop score VS ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women, Minerva Gynecol, 67, 6, pp. 499-505, (2015)