Making oneself predictable: reduced temporal variability facilitates joint action coordination

被引:0
作者
Cordula Vesper
Robrecht P. R. D. van der Wel
Günther Knoblich
Natalie Sebanz
机构
[1] Radboud University,Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Center for Cognition
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2011年 / 211卷
关键词
Temporal coordination; Joint action; Coordination strategy; Predictability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Performing joint actions often requires precise temporal coordination of individual actions. The present study investigated how people coordinate their actions at discrete points in time when continuous or rhythmic information about others’ actions is not available. In particular, we tested the hypothesis that making oneself predictable is used as a coordination strategy. Pairs of participants were instructed to coordinate key presses in a two-choice reaction time task, either responding in synchrony (Experiments 1 and 2) or in close temporal succession (Experiment 3). Across all experiments, we found that coactors reduced the variability of their actions in the joint context compared with the same task performed individually. Correlation analyses indicated that the less variable the actions were, the better was interpersonal coordination. The relation between reduced variability and improved coordination performance was not observed when pairs of participants performed independent tasks next to each other without intending to coordinate. These findings support the claim that reducing variability is used as a coordination strategy to achieve predictability. Identifying coordination strategies contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms involved in real-time coordination.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 530
页数:13
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Aiello JR(2001)Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring Group Dynam Theory Res Pract 5 163-180
[2]  
Douthitt EA(2008)Action co-representation: the joint SNARC effect Soc Neurosci 3 410-420
[3]  
Atmaca S(1981)The evolution of cooperation Science 211 1390-1396
[4]  
Sebanz N(1996)Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 22 1482-1493
[5]  
Prinz W(2009)Partner-specific adaptation in dialog Top Cognit Sci 1 274-291
[6]  
Knoblich G(2010)The interplay of cognition and cooperation Phil Trans R Soc B 365 2699-2710
[7]  
Axelrod R(2004)Why is conversation so easy? Trends Cognit Sci 8 8-11
[8]  
Hamilton WD(2009)Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog Top Cognit Sci 1 292-304
[9]  
Brennan SE(2007)Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: on the possible role of action simulation in synchronization Conscious Cognition 16 102-111
[10]  
Clark HH(2003)Action coordination in groups and individuals: learning anticipatory control J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 29 1006-1016