The dosimetric impact of replacing the TG-43 algorithm by model based dose calculation for liver brachytherapy

[1] Beaulieu L(2012)Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation Med Phys 39 6208-36

[2] Carlsson Tedgren Å(2004)Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations Med Phys 31 633-74

[3] Carrier JF(2008)A Monte Carlo study on the effect of seed design on the interseed attenuation in permanent prostate implants Med Phys 35 3671-81

[4] Davis SD(2016)Comparison of Dose Distributions With TG-43 and Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithms Applied to Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Patient Plans Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95 1520-6

[5] Mourtada F(2015)A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort Phys Medica 31 669-76

[6] Rivard MJ(2018)A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy J Contemp Brachytherapy 10 73-84

[7] Thomson RM(2012)Influence of trace elements in human tissue in low-energy photon brachytherapy dosimetry Phys Med Biol 57 3585-96

[8] Verhaegen F(2016)On the impact of improved dosimetric accuracy on head and neck high dose rate brachytherapy Radiother Oncol 120 92-97

[9] Wareing TA(2018)Impact of a commercially available model-based dose calculation algorithm on treatment planning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer J Radiat Res 59 198-206

[10] Williamson JF(2017)Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix Brachytherapy 16 624-9

[1] Beaulieu L(2012)Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation Med Phys 39 6208-36

[2] Carlsson Tedgren Å(2004)Update of AAPM Task Group No. 43 Report: A revised AAPM protocol for brachytherapy dose calculations Med Phys 31 633-74

[3] Carrier JF(2008)A Monte Carlo study on the effect of seed design on the interseed attenuation in permanent prostate implants Med Phys 35 3671-81

[4] Davis SD(2016)Comparison of Dose Distributions With TG-43 and Collapsed Cone Convolution Algorithms Applied to Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Patient Plans Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95 1520-6

[5] Mourtada F(2015)A retrospective dosimetric comparison of TG43 and a commercially available MBDCA for an APBI brachytherapy patient cohort Phys Medica 31 669-76

[6] Rivard MJ(2018)A comparative assessment of inhomogeneity and finite patient dimension effects in 60Co and 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy J Contemp Brachytherapy 10 73-84

[7] Thomson RM(2012)Influence of trace elements in human tissue in low-energy photon brachytherapy dosimetry Phys Med Biol 57 3585-96

[8] Verhaegen F(2016)On the impact of improved dosimetric accuracy on head and neck high dose rate brachytherapy Radiother Oncol 120 92-97

[9] Wareing TA(2018)Impact of a commercially available model-based dose calculation algorithm on treatment planning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer J Radiat Res 59 198-206

[10] Williamson JF(2017)Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix Brachytherapy 16 624-9