The Effects of Area and Habitat Heterogeneity on Bird Richness and Composition in High Elevation Wetlands (“Bofedales”) of the Central Andes of Peru

被引:0
作者
Grace P. Servat
Renzo Alcocer
Melvi V. Larico
Magaly E. Olarte
Reynaldo Linares-Palomino
Alfonso Alonso
Karim Ledesma
机构
[1] Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute,Center for Conservation and Sustainability
[2] Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos,Departamento de Ornitología
[3] Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa,Center for Conservation and Sustainability
[4] Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional San Antonio Abad del Cusco,undefined
[5] Paraninfo Universitario,undefined
[6] Plaza de Armas,undefined
[7] Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute,undefined
来源
Wetlands | 2018年 / 38卷
关键词
Diversity; Microhabitats; Cover; Cushion bogs; Indicator species; Diversidad; Microhábitats; Cobertura ; Bofedales; Especies indicadoras;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We assessed area and habitat heterogeneity effects on avian richness and composition in bofedales that differed in size and microhabitat diversity. We analyzed data collected in 2 seasons and 24 bofedales using General Linear Models, Ordinary Least Square models to establish the relationship of predictor variables on richness and Akaike Information Criterion for model selection. We evaluate composition classifying species into groups using Bray Curtis ordination, followed by Multiple Response Permutation Procedure to test for differences among groups, and Indicator Species Analysis to identify species. Bofedales differed in richness (F = 5.1, p < 0.001) and microhabitat diversity (F = 23.4, p < 0.001), but no seasonal differences emerged (p > 0.05). The best model indicates that 54% of variance in richness was explained by area and microhabitat diversity, however, a tendency to decrease in microhabitat diversity as area increases, suggests a relatively more important role of area. Results are supported by composition, as microhabitats not only differed pairwise (T = −94.14, A = 0.601, p < 0.001) and had significant indicator species (p < 0.05), but because its differential contribution to richness, as some microhabitats were more speciose than others. As such, few species-rich microhabitats may contribute more to richness than many species-poor ones which is not predicted by the habitat heterogeneity hypothesis. Disentangling the influence of area and habitat heterogeneity on species richness is important to establish conservation priorities that ensure bofedales integrity under imminent climate change.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1145
页数:12
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Angermeier PL(1998)Local vs. regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia Ecology 79 911-927
[2]  
Winston MR(1921)Species and area Journal of Ecology 9 95-99
[3]  
Arrhenius O(2014)The richness–heterogeneity relationship differs between heterogeneity measures within and among habitats Ecography 37 528-535
[4]  
Bar-Massada A(2016)The dual role of Andean topography in primary divergence: functional and neutral variation among populations of the hummingbird, BMC Evolutionary Biology 16 22-374
[5]  
Wood EM(2013)New geographies of water and climate change in Peru: Coupled natural and social transformations in the Santa River watershed Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 363-61
[6]  
Benham PM(2006)Global biodiversity conservation priorities Science 313 58-196
[7]  
Witt CC(1974)Pastoral nomadism in the Andes Current Anthropology 15 188-1087
[8]  
Bury J(2011)Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services Journal of Applied Ecology 48 1079-52
[9]  
Mark BG(1998)Ecosystem consequences of changing biodiversity Bioscience 48 45-21
[10]  
Mark C(2012)Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages Journal of Plant Ecology 1 3-833