On the Nature of Semantic Constraints on Lexical Access

被引:0
作者
Andrea Weber
Matthew W. Crocker
机构
[1] Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics,
[2] Saarland University,undefined
来源
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research | 2012年 / 41卷
关键词
Spoken-word recognition; Semantic constraints; Eye-tracking; German;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present two eye-tracking experiments that investigate lexical frequency and semantic context constraints in spoken-word recognition in German. In both experiments, the pivotal words were pairs of nouns overlapping at onset but varying in lexical frequency. In Experiment 1, German listeners showed an expected frequency bias towards high-frequency competitors (e.g., Blume, ‘flower’) when instructed to click on low-frequency targets (e.g., Bluse, ‘blouse’). In Experiment 2, semantically constraining context increased the availability of appropriate low-frequency target words prior to word onset, but did not influence the availability of semantically inappropriate high-frequency competitors at the same time. Immediately after target word onset, however, the activation of high-frequency competitors was reduced in semantically constraining sentences, but still exceeded that of unrelated distractor words significantly. The results suggest that (1) semantic context acts to downgrade activation of inappropriate competitors rather than to exclude them from competition, and (2) semantic context influences spoken-word recognition, over and above anticipation of upcoming referents.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 214
页数:19
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [1] Allopenna P.(1998)Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models Journal of Memory and Language 38 419-439
  • [2] Magnuson J.(1999)Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference Cognition 73 247-264
  • [3] Tanenhaus M.(2007)The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing Journal of Memory and Language 57 502-518
  • [4] Altmann G.(2008)Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground Cognition 109 18-40
  • [5] Kamide Y.(1988)Sentence processing and lexical access: The influence of the focus-identifying task Journal of Memory and Language 27 359-367
  • [6] Altmann G.(2004)The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story? Journal of Memory and Language 50 456-476
  • [7] Kamide Y.(1994)Vertical similarity in spoken word recognition: The role of sentence context Journal of Memory and Language 32 193-210
  • [8] Barr D. J.(1990)Word familiarity and frequency in visual and auditory word recognition Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 1084-1096
  • [9] Blutner R.(1993)Auditory word recognition: Extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 81-94
  • [10] Sommer R.(1974)The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language Cognitive Psychology 6 84-107