Technical Change and Green Productivity

被引:0
作者
Peng Li
Yaofu Ouyang
机构
[1] Institute of Industrial Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
[2] Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2020年 / 76卷
关键词
Technical change; Green productivity; PSTR; FDI; Absorptive capacity; O33; O44; Q55; Q56;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When technologies could be “dirty” and “clean” in the context of green development, technical change does not necessarily mean (green) productivity growth. This paper studies the nonlinear impact of technical change on green productivity in China by applying a panel smooth transition regression approach with a panel data set of 284 prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2015. Green productivity is measured by the meta-frontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity growth (MML) index. Technical change is considered in three dimensions: indigenous technical change indicated by the stock of knowledge based on patents, technology transfers from foreign direct investment (FDI), and absorptive capacity. We find a non-linear relationship between technical change and green productivity contingent on specific economic situations and the city’s endowment of natural resources. In general, indigenous technical change shows an adverse effect on green productivity in China, which is much more prominent in the resource-dependent cities than in the non-resource-dependent cities. Technology transfers from FDI may either improve or hinder green productivity growth as economic situations change, while absorptive capacity has a small but positive effect. Also, these two effects are affected by the city’s endowment of natural resources. Accordingly, we discuss some policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 298
页数:27
相关论文
共 173 条
[11]  
Martin R(2009)How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology J Dev Econ 90 192-199
[12]  
Van Reenen J(1998)How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? J Int Econ 45 115-135
[13]  
Aitken BJ(2006)Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States J Int Econ 68 325-344
[14]  
Harrison AE(2014)‘Green’ productivity growth in China’s industrial economy Energy Econ 44 89-98
[15]  
Alfaro L(2011)Structural change, productivity growth and industrial transformation in China China Econ Rev 22 133-150
[16]  
Chanda A(2015)Environmentally sensitive productivity growth and its decompositions in China: a metafrontier malmquist-luenberger productivity index approach Empir Econ 49 1017-1043
[17]  
Kalemli-Ozcan S(1997)Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach J Environ Manag 51 229-240
[18]  
Sayek S(1997)North-South R&D spillovers Econ J 107 134-149
[19]  
Ang JB(1989)Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D Econ J 99 569-596
[20]  
Azman-Saini W(1990)Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation Adm Sci Q 35 128-152