Technical Change and Green Productivity

被引:0
作者
Peng Li
Yaofu Ouyang
机构
[1] Institute of Industrial Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
[2] Institute of Economics,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2020年 / 76卷
关键词
Technical change; Green productivity; PSTR; FDI; Absorptive capacity; O33; O44; Q55; Q56;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When technologies could be “dirty” and “clean” in the context of green development, technical change does not necessarily mean (green) productivity growth. This paper studies the nonlinear impact of technical change on green productivity in China by applying a panel smooth transition regression approach with a panel data set of 284 prefecture-level cities from 2004 to 2015. Green productivity is measured by the meta-frontier Malmquist–Luenberger productivity growth (MML) index. Technical change is considered in three dimensions: indigenous technical change indicated by the stock of knowledge based on patents, technology transfers from foreign direct investment (FDI), and absorptive capacity. We find a non-linear relationship between technical change and green productivity contingent on specific economic situations and the city’s endowment of natural resources. In general, indigenous technical change shows an adverse effect on green productivity in China, which is much more prominent in the resource-dependent cities than in the non-resource-dependent cities. Technology transfers from FDI may either improve or hinder green productivity growth as economic situations change, while absorptive capacity has a small but positive effect. Also, these two effects are affected by the city’s endowment of natural resources. Accordingly, we discuss some policy implications.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 298
页数:27
相关论文
共 173 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D(2002)Directed technical change Rev Econ Stud 69 781-809
[2]  
Acemoglu D(2012)The environment and directed technical change Am Econ Rev 102 131-66
[3]  
Aghion P(2004)Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry Q J Econ 119 1049-1090
[4]  
Bursztyn L(2016)Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: evidence from the auto industry J Polit Econ 124 1-51
[5]  
Hemous D(1999)Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela Am Econ Rev 89 605-618
[6]  
Acemoglu D(2004)FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets J Int Econ 64 89-112
[7]  
Linn J(2009)Foreign direct investment and its impact on the Thai economy: the role of financial development J Econ Finance 33 316-323
[8]  
Aghion P(2010)Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and economic growth: international evidence Econ Model 27 1079-1089
[9]  
Dechezleprêtre A(2010)FDI and economic growth: new evidence on the role of financial markets Econ Lett 107 211-213
[10]  
Hemous D(2017)Do R&D activities matter for productivity? A regional spatial approach assessing the role of human and social capital Econ Model 60 448-461