Production systems and important antimicrobial resistant-pathogenic bacteria in poultry: a review

被引:0
作者
Philip H. W. Mak
Muhammad Attiq Rehman
Elijah G. Kiarie
Edward Topp
Moussa S. Diarra
机构
[1] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC),Guelph Research and Development Centre
[2] University of Guelph,Department of Animal Biosciences
[3] London Research and Development Center,undefined
[4] AAFC,undefined
来源
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology | / 13卷
关键词
Antibiotic-free; Antimicrobial resistance; Conventional feeding; Organic; Poultry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Economic losses and market constraints caused by bacterial diseases such as colibacillosis due to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and necrotic enteritis due to Clostridium perfringens remain major problems for poultry producers, despite substantial efforts in prevention and control. Antibiotics have been used not only for the treatment and prevention of such diseases, but also for growth promotion. Consequently, these practices have been linked to the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistant bacteria which constitute a significant global threat to humans, animals, and the environment. To break down the antimicrobial resistance (AMR), poultry producers are restricting the antimicrobial use (AMU) while adopting the antibiotic-free (ABF) and organic production practices to satisfy consumers’ demands. However, it is not well understood how ABF and organic poultry production practices influence AMR profiles in the poultry gut microbiome. Various Gram-negative (Salmonella enterica serovars, Campylobacter jejuni/coli, E. coli) and Gram-positive (Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp. and C. perfringens) bacteria harboring multiple AMR determinants have been reported in poultry including organically- and ABF-raised chickens. In this review, we discussed major poultry production systems (conventional, ABF and organic) and their impacts on AMR in some potential pathogenic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria which could allow identifying issues and opportunities to develop efficient and safe production practices in controlling pathogens.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 747 条
[1]  
Diarra MS(2014)Antibiotics in Canadian poultry productions and anticipated alternatives Front Microbiol 5 1-15
[2]  
Malouin F(2018)Genotypes and phenotypes of enterococci isolated from broiler chickens Front Sustain Food Syst 2 1-28
[3]  
Rehman MA(2014)Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet Gut Microbes 5 108-119
[4]  
Yin X(2007)Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Appl Environ Microbiol 73 6566-6576
[5]  
Zaheer R(2019)Effects of wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) pomace feeding on gut microbiota and blood metabolites in free-range pastured broiler chickens Poult Sci 98 3739-3755
[6]  
Goji N(2006)Necrotic enteritis; a continuing challenge for the poultry industry Worlds Poult Sci J 62 221-248
[7]  
Amoako KK(2003)Effects of tylosin on bacterial mucolysis, Clostridium perfringens colonization, and intestinal barrier function in a chick model of necrotic enteritis Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47 3311-3317
[8]  
McAllister T(1984)Effects of diet and antimicrobials on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal Clostridium perfringens, and ileal weight of broiler chicks Poult Sci 63 2036-2042
[9]  
Pan D(2011)Necrotic enteritis in broilers: an updated review on the pathogenesis Avian Pathol 40 341-347
[10]  
Yu Z(2020)Poultry coccidiosis: design and interpretation of vaccine studies Front Vet Sci 7 1-12