Influence of payment modes on farmers’ contribution to climate change adaptation: understanding differences using a choice experiment in Nepal

被引:0
作者
Uttam Khanal
Clevo Wilson
Boon L. Lee
Viet-Ngu Hoang
Shunsuke Managi
机构
[1] Queensland University of Technology,QUT Business School
[2] Kyushu University,Department of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urban Institute
来源
Sustainability Science | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
Agriculture; Climate change adaptation; Choice experiment; Random parameter logit; Willingness to pay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adaptation has become a key priority in dealing with climate change issues. However, successful implementation of climate change adaptation entails substantial financial investment. This study examines differences in Nepalese farming households’ willingness to contribute to the implementation of adaptation programs across monetary and non-monetary modes of payments. To this end, we undertake discrete choice experiments with monetary payment and labor contributions as the payment vehicles. We find that farmers are interested in participating in and financially supporting the implementation of climate change adaptation initiatives that increase the availability of climate-adaptive crop varieties, improve soil quality, expand irrigation and build farmers’ capacity in terms of climate-adaptive farming. Factors influencing farmers’ participation in adaptation programs include age, income, access to extension services, size of land holdings, number of farm parcels, climate change perception and climate change experience. Furthermore, the findings reveal significant heterogeneity in the farmers’ preferences across three agro-ecological regions in Nepal. Our findings also strengthen the methodological validity of the results of the choice experiment, which indicated that farmers are willing to pay significantly more when asked to make a payment in terms of a labor contribution compared to a monetary payment for the implementation of adaptation programs. Overall, the findings of this study justify the relevance of implementing agricultural adaptation programs in Nepal.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1040
页数:13
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [1] Abramson A(2011)Willingness to pay, borrow, and work for rural water service improvements in developing countries Water Resour Res 47 W11512-75
  • [2] Becker N(1998)Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation Am J Agric Econ 80 64-745
  • [3] Garb Y(2012)Climate change scepticism and public support for mitigation: evidence from an Australian choice experiment Glob Environ Change 22 736-44
  • [4] Lazarovitch N(2006)Valuing the environment in developing countries: problems and potentials Asia Pac J Environ Dev 13 27-751
  • [5] Adamowicz W(2007)Choice modeling at the “market stall”: individual versus collective interest in environmental valuation Ecol Econ 60 743-684
  • [6] Boxall P(2008)Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia Ecol Econ 65 675-1022
  • [7] Williams M(2010)Rice landrace diversity in Nepal. Socio-economic and ecological factors determining rice landrace diversity in three agro-ecozones of Nepal based on farm surveys Genet Resour Crop Evol 57 1013-235
  • [8] Louviere J(2012)Can farmers’ adaptation to climate change be explained by socio-economic household-level variables? Glob Environ Change 22 223-132
  • [9] Akter S(2015)Gender, agrobiodiversity, and climate change: a study of adaptation practices in the Nepal Himalayas World Dev 70 122-253
  • [10] Bennett J(1996)A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation Ecol Econ 18 243-1252