The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time

被引:0
作者
Kenneth I. Forster
Christine Guerrera
Lisa Elliot
机构
[1] New Mexico State University,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Arizona,Department of Psychology
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2009年 / 41卷
关键词
Relative Clause; Lexical Decision Task; Object Relative; Ambiguous Word; Maze Task;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The maze task is an online measure of sentence processing time that provides an alternative to the standard moving window version of self-paced reading. Rather than each word of the sentence being presented in succession, two words are presented at the same time, and the participant must choose which word is a grammatical continuation of the sentence. This procedure forces the reader into an incremental mode of processing in which each word must be fully integrated with the preceding context before the next word can be considered. Previous research with this technique has not considered whether it is sufficiently sensitive to syntactic complexity effects or to garden path effects. Four experiments are reported demonstrating that reliable differences in processing time for subject relatives and object relatives can be obtained, and that this technique generates garden path effects that correspond closely with the data from eyetracking experiments, but without the spillover effects that are sometimes obtained with eyetracking. It is also shown that the task is sensitive to word frequency effects, producing estimates well in excess of those found with eyetracking.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 171
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Dopkins S.(1992)Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution Journal of Memory & Language 31 461-476
[2]  
Morris R. K.(1981)Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A 465-495
[3]  
Rayner K.(2003)DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35 116-124
[4]  
Forster K. I.(1985)The psychological status of overgenerated sentences Cognition 19 101-131
[5]  
Forster K. I.(1998)Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies Cognition 68 1-76
[6]  
Forster J. C.(1982)Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111 228-238
[7]  
Freedman S. E.(1991)Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory Journal of Memory & Language 30 580-602
[8]  
Forster K. I.(1997)Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension Journal of Memory & Language 36 569-587
[9]  
Gibson E.(2006)Reading and disappearing text: Cognitive control of eye movements Vision Research 46 310-323
[10]  
Just M. A.(1998)Toward a model of eye movement control in reading Psychological Review 105 125-157