Measuring Unmet Needs among Persons Living with HIV at Different Stages of the Care Continuum

被引:0
作者
Thurka Sangaramoorthy
Meredith Haddix
Anya Agopian
Hannah Yellin
Farah Mouhanna
Hibo Abdi
Kerri Dorsey
James Peterson
Michael Kharfen
Amanda D. Castel
机构
[1] University of Maryland,Department of Anthropology
[2] The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health,District of Columbia Department of Health HIV/AIDS
[3] Emory University Rollins School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology
[4] Hepatitis,undefined
[5] STD,undefined
[6] and TB Administration,undefined
[7] The Milken Institute School of Public Health,undefined
来源
AIDS and Behavior | 2021年 / 25卷
关键词
HIV; Engagement in care; Unmet needs; Continuum of care;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Unmet needs can impede optimal care engagement, impacting the health and well-being of people living with HIV (PLWH); yet, whether unmet needs differ by care engagement status is not well understood. Using surveys and qualitative interviews, we examined and compared unmet needs for PLWH (n = 172) at different levels of care engagement. Unmet needs varied only slightly by care status. Survey findings revealed that provision of housing, emergency financial assistance, employment assistance, and food security were the greatest unmet need; for those in care, housing was the greatest unmet need, whereas for those sporadically in care or out of care, employment assistance was the greatest unmet needs. Qualitative interviews likewise illustrated that a lack of financial resources including insurance, housing, employment, and transportation presented barriers to care engagement across all care groups. Our findings indicate that unmet needs among PLWH are complex and multi-faceted across care engagement status.
引用
收藏
页码:1954 / 1967
页数:13
相关论文
共 240 条
[21]  
Steiner JF(2013)The state of engagement in HIV care in the United States: from cascade to continuum to control Clin Infect Dis. 51 392-431
[22]  
Del Rio C(2019)Ending the HIV epidemic: a plan for the United States JAMA 26 785-401
[23]  
Burman WJ(2009)Fighting HIV/AIDS in washington, D.C. Health Aff. 127 422-S8
[24]  
Yehia BR(2010)Test and treat DC: forecasting the impact of a comprehensive HIV strategy in Washington DC Clin Infect Dis. 106 399-S55
[25]  
French B(2014)Temporal association between expanded HIV testing and improvements in population-based HIV/AIDS clinical outcomes, district of Columbia AIDS Care 21 S3-531
[26]  
Fleishman JA(2012)Implementing a novel citywide rapid HIV testing campaign in Washington, D.C.: findings and lessons learned Public Health Rep. 6 S44-S24
[27]  
Skarbinski J(2019)Longitudinal outcomes of HIV- infected persons re-engaged in care using a community-based re-engagement approach AIDS Care 19 522-303
[28]  
Rosenberg E(2016)2015–2020 national HIV/AIDS strategy goals for HIV linkage and retention in care: recommendations from program implementers Am J Public Health 14 1253-101
[29]  
Paz-Bailey G(2007)Making the connection: the importance of engagement and retention in HIV medical care AIDS Patient Care STDS 69 S16-1035
[30]  
Marks G(2015)Sorting through the lost and found: are patient perceptions of engagement in care consistent with standard continuum of care measures? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 27 297-753