An empirical investigation of country level efficiency and national systems of entrepreneurship using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the TOBIT model

被引:0
作者
Nishat Tasnim
Munshi Naser Ibne Afzal
机构
[1] Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST),Department of Economics
[2] University of Southern Queensland,School of Commerce
[3] HBMSU,undefined
关键词
Global entrepreneurship index 9GEI); Efficiency; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Tobit model;
D O I
10.1186/s40497-018-0138-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this paper is to investigate effects of national systems of entrepreneurship on the country level efficiency, on addition we find what macro factors affect efficiency as well. From a comprehensive database of 59 countries using GEM, WDI, WCI for 2018 using data envelopment analysis (DEA) we find the results support the theoretical grounding of Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEI) hypothesis. The GEI methodology has been designed to capture the core features of the National Systems of Entrepreneurship theory. It approaches country-level entrepreneurship as a systemic phenomenon, which is driven by the interaction between individual-level actions and country-level framework conditions. While discussing country level framework, we have depicted key macroeconomic indicators in the analysis along with GEI index. The DEA analysis followed this framework to assess the performance of the study countries. Though inefficiency widely varies across countries, while the group of factor-driven countries is the most inefficient while innovation-driven economies are the most efficient ones. Subsequently, we apply the Tobit model to explain efficiency. Based on the Tobit regression model, the DEA VRS technical efficient score could be improved through GDP per capita and social capital. From policy perspective, to promote economic growth policy makers should consider national systems of entrepreneurship as their priority so that entrepreneurs can allocate resources in the economy effectively.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abdih Y(2006)Relating the knowledge production function to total factor productivity: An endogenous growth puzzle IMF Staff Papers 53 242-271
[2]  
Joutz F(1988)Innovation in large and small firms—An empirical analysis American Economic Review 78 678-690
[3]  
Acs ZJ(2013)National Systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications Research Policy 43 476-494
[4]  
Audretsch DB(2014)National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications Research Policy 43 476-494
[5]  
Acs ZJ(2009)A knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship Small Business Economics 32 15-30
[6]  
Autio E(2009)A knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship Small Business Economics 32 15-30
[7]  
Szerb L(2014)An empirical investigation of the National Innovation System (NIS) using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the TOBIT model International Review of Applied Economics 28 507-523
[8]  
Acs ZJ(2012)Knowledge-based economy (KBE) frameworks and empirical investigation of KBE input-output indicators for ASEAN International Journal of Economics and Finance 4 13-22
[9]  
Autio E(2013)An empirical productivity analysis of ASEAN economies in transition towards knowledge-based economy Asian Research Policy 4 1-9
[10]  
Szerb L(1992)Model of growth through creative destruction Econometrica 60 323-351