Outcomes after delayed and second autologous stem cell transplant in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma

被引:0
作者
Christopher Lemieux
Lori S. Muffly
David J. Iberri
Juliana K. Craig
Laura J. Johnston
Robert Lowsky
Parveen Shiraz
Andrew R. Rezvani
Matthew J. Frank
Wen-Kai Weng
Everett Meyer
Judith A. Shizuru
Sally Arai
Michaela Liedtke
Robert S. Negrin
David B. Miklos
Surbhi Sidana
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Medicine
[2] Université Laval,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2021年 / 56卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluated the outcomes of 168 patients undergoing delayed or second autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) from 2010 to 2019. Overall, 21% (n = 35) patients had received a prior transplant and 69% (n = 116) underwent transplant at first relapse. Overall, 27% patients had high-risk cytogenetics and 15% had ISS stage III disease. Stem cell collection was performed after relapse in 72% and 35% of patients received maintenance therapy. Median PFS from salvage treatment and transplant were 28 and 19 months, respectively. Median OS from salvage treatment and transplant was 69 and 55 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that ASCT in first relapse was associated with superior PFS (HR 0.63, p = 0.03) and OS (HR 0.59, p = 0.04) compared to later lines of therapy. In addition, PFS of ≥36 months with prior therapy was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.62, p = 0.04) and OS (HR 0.41, p = 0.01). Ninety-five patients underwent delayed transplant at first relapse, median PFS and OS from start of therapy was 30 and 69 months, and median OS from diagnosis was 106 months. These data may serve as a guide when counseling patients undergoing ASCT for relapsed MM and provide a benchmark in designing clinical trials of transplantation/comparative treatments for relapsed MM.
引用
收藏
页码:2664 / 2671
页数:7
相关论文
共 241 条
[1]  
Palumbo A(2011)Personalized therapy in multiple myeloma according to patient age and vulnerability: a report of the European Myeloma Network (EMN) Blood 118 4519-29
[2]  
Bringhen S(2009)Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation J Clin Oncol 27 2758-65
[3]  
Ludwig H(1996)A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome N. Engl J Med 335 91-7
[4]  
Dimopoulos MA(2003)High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma N. Engl J Med 348 1875-83
[5]  
Blade J(2020)Multiple myeloma: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management Am J Hematol 95 548-67
[6]  
Mateos MV(2017)Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma N. Engl J Med 376 1311-20
[7]  
Smith BD(2013)Evaluating the effects of lenalidomide induction therapy on peripheral stem cells collection in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma Support Care Cancer 21 2437-42
[8]  
Smith GL(1997)Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells following high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with multiple myeloma Br J Haematol 98 736-44
[9]  
Hurria A(2003)Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group Br J Haematol 121 749-57
[10]  
Hortobagyi GN(2005)International staging system for multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23 3412-20