Artificial Moral Agents Within an Ethos of AI4SG

被引:0
作者
Mabaso B.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Pretoria, Pretoria
关键词
AI4SG; Artificial moral agency; Exemplarism; Machine ethics;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-020-00400-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to proliferate into every area of modern life, there is no doubt that society has to think deeply about the potential impact, whether negative or positive, that it will have. Whilst scholars recognise that AI can usher in a new era of personal, social and economic prosperity, they also warn of the potential for it to be misused towards the detriment of society. Deliberate strategies are therefore required to ensure that AI can be safely integrated into society in a manner that would maximise the good for as many people as possible, whilst minimising the bad. One of the most urgent societal expectations of artificial agents is the need for them to behave in a manner that is morally relevant, i.e. to become artificial moral agents (AMAs). In this article, I will argue that exemplarism, an ethical theory based on virtue ethics, can be employed in the building of computationally rational AMAs with weak machine ethics. I further argue that three features of exemplarism, namely grounding in moral exemplars, meeting community expectations and practical simplicity, are crucial to its uniqueness and suitability for application in building AMAs that fit the ethos of AI4SG. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 21
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Abel D., Macglashan J., Littman M.L., Reinforcement learning as a framework for ethical decision making, In AAAI Workshop - Technical Report, pp. 54-61, (2016)
  • [2] Abney K., Robotics, ethical theory, and metaethics: A guide for the perplexed, Robot Ethics, the Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, 3, pp. 35-52, (2012)
  • [3] Aghion P.J., Benjamin F., Jones C.I., Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth, (2017)
  • [4] Allen C., Wallach W., Moral machines: Contradiction in terms, or abdication of human responsibility?, Robot Ethics, (2011)
  • [5] Alzahrani H., Artificial intelligence: uses and misuses, Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 16, 1s, (2016)
  • [6] Anderson M., Anderson S.L., Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent, AI Magazine, 28, 4, (2007)
  • [7] Anderson S.L., Anderson M., A prima facie duty approach to machine ethics and its application to elder care, In Workshops at the Twenty-Fffth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (2011)
  • [8] Annas J., Intelligent virtue, (2011)
  • [9] Argall B.D., Chernova S., Veloso M., Browning B., A survey of robot learning from demonstration, Robotics and autonomous systems, 57, 5, pp. 469-483, (2009)
  • [10] Baum S.D., Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence, AI and Society (October), pp. 1-12, (2017)