Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies

被引:214
作者
Subhrendu K. Pattanayak
D. Evan Mercer
Erin Sills
Jui-Chen Yang
机构
[1] Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC
[2] Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
[3] College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
关键词
Contour hedgerows; Meta-analysis; Soil and water conservation; Tree planting; Vote-counting;
D O I
10.1023/A:1024809108210
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In light of the large number of empirical studies of agroforestry adoption published during the last decade, we believe it is time to take stock and identify general determinants of agroforestry adoption. In reviewing 120 articles on adoption of agricultural and forestry technology by small holders, we find five categories of factors that explain technology adoption within an economic framework: preferences, resource endowments, market incentives, biophysical factors, and risk and uncertainty. By selecting only empirical analyses that focus on agroforestry and related investments, we narrow our list down to 32 studies primarily from tropical areas. We apply vote-counting based meta-analysis to these studies and evaluate the inclusion and significance of the five adoption factors. Our analysis shows that preferences and resource endowments are the factors most often included in studies. However, adoption behavior is most likely to be significantly influenced by risk, biophysical, and resource factors. In our conclusion, we discuss specific recommendations for the next generation of adoption studies and meta-analyses that include considering a fuller menu of variables, reporting key statistics and marginal probabilities, and conducting weighted meta-regressions.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 186
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Caveness F.A., Kurtz W.B., Agroforestry adoption and risk perception by farmers in Senegal, Agroforestry Systems, 21, pp. 11-25, (1993)
  • [12] Caviglia J., Kahn J., Diffusion of sustainable agriculture in the Brazilian tropical rain forest: A discrete choice analysis, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49, 2, pp. 311-334, (2001)
  • [13] Clay D., Reardon T., Kangasniemi J., Sustainable intensification in the highland tropics: Rwadan farmers' investments in land conservation and soil fertility, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 46, 2, pp. 351-378, (1998)
  • [14] Cook T., Cooper H., Corday D., Hartmann H., Hedges L., Light R., Et al., Meta-Analysis for Explanation: A Casebook, (1992)
  • [15] Current D., Lutz E., Scherr S., The costs and benefits of Agroforestry to farmers, The World Bank Research Observer, 10, 2, pp. 151-180, (1995)
  • [16] Current D., Lutz E., Scherr S., Costs, Benefits, and Farmer Adoption of Agroforestry: Project Experience in Central America and the Caribbean, World Bank Environment Paper No. 14, 14, (1995)
  • [17] Feather P., Amacher G., Role of information in the adoption of best management practices for water quality improvement, Agricultural Economics, 11, pp. 159-170, (1994)
  • [18] Feder G., Just R., Zilberman D., Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey, Economic Development and Cultural Change, pp. 255-297, (1985)
  • [19] Franzel S., Scherr S., Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa, (2002)
  • [20] Glendinning A., Mahapatra A., Mitchell C.P., Modes of communication and effectiveness of agroforestry extension in eastern India, Human Ecology, 29, 3, pp. 283-305, (2001)