International environmental agreements: coordinated action under foresight

被引:0
作者
Effrosyni Diamantoudi
Eftichios S. Sartzetakis
机构
[1] Concordia University,Department of Economics
[2] University of Macedonia,Department of Economics
来源
Economic Theory | 2015年 / 59卷
关键词
Environmental agreements; Foresight; Stable set; D6; Q5; C7;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the formation of international environmental agreements (IEAs). We extend the existing literature by endogenizing the reaction of the IEA’s members to a deviation by a group of members. We assume that when a group of countries contemplates exiting or joining an agreement, it takes into account the reactions of other countries ignited by its own actions. We identify conditions under which the solution always exists and fully characterize the coalitionally farsighted stable IEAs. The new farsighted IEAs can be much larger than those some of the previous models supported and are always Pareto efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 546
页数:19
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Amir R(1996)Cournot oligopoly and the theory of supermodular games Games Econ. Behav. 15 132-148
  • [2] Chander P(1992)Theoretical foundations of negotiations and cost-sharing in transfrontier pollution problems Eur. Econ. Rev. 36 388-398
  • [3] Tulkens H(1997)The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities Int. J. Game Theory 26 379-401
  • [4] Chander P(2007)The gamma-core and coalition formation Int. J. Game Theory 35 539-556
  • [5] Tulkens H(2012)Economic theory and the global environment Econ. Theory 49 217-225
  • [6] Chander P(1994)Farsighted coalitional stability J. Econ. Theory 63 299-325
  • [7] Chichilnisky G(1960)The problem of social cost J. Law Econ. 3 1-44
  • [8] Chwe MS-Y(2008)Dynamic effects on the stability of international environmental agreements J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 55 163-174
  • [9] Coase R(1983)On the stability of collusive price leadership Can. J. Econ. 16 17-25
  • [10] de Zeeuw A(2006)Stable international environmental agreements: an analytical approach J. Public Econ. Theory 8 247-263