Intergenerational Similarities in Risk Factors for Offending

被引:28
作者
Farrington D.P. [1 ]
Ttofi M.M. [1 ]
Crago R.V. [1 ]
Coid J.W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge
[2] Violence Prevention Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Garrod Building, Turner St., London
关键词
Intergenerational; Longitudinal; Offending; Risk factors;
D O I
10.1007/s40865-015-0005-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The main aim of this article is to investigate to what extent the relationships between risk factors and offending by males are similar from one generation to the next. Methods: The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 London males who were originally studied at age 8. This article compares these males (generation 2 or G2) with their biological parents (generation 1 or G1) and biological children (generation 3 or G3). Ninety-four per cent of G2 males were interviewed at age 32, while 85 % of G3 males were interviewed at an average age of 25. Results: Up to age 21, 34 % of G2 males were convicted, compared with 20 % of G3 males. Eleven risk factors were significant predictors of both G2 and G3 offending: a convicted father and mother, harsh discipline, poor parental supervision, a disrupted family, low family income, large family size, poor housing, low school attainment, daring/risk-taking and antisocial child behaviour. The findings were markedly different for only three risk factors: parental conflict, low social class and hyperactivity/attention problems. Over 20 risk factors, G2 effect sizes correlated.80 with G3 effect sizes. Conclusions: G2 results were similar to G3 results. While risk factors were not exactly comparable between generations, most of the findings in one generation were replicated in the next generation. © 2015, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 62
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]  
Farrington D.P., Loeber R., Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, pp. 100-122, (2000)
[22]  
Farrington D.P., Piquero A.R., Jennings W.G., Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development, (2013)
[23]  
Farrington D.P., Ttofi M.M., Developmental and life-course theories of offending, The development of criminal and antisocial behavior: Theory, research and practical applications, pp. 19-38, (2015)
[24]  
Farrington D.P., Ttofi M.M., Crago R.V., Coid J.W., Prevalence, frequency, onset, desistance and criminal career duration in self-reports compared with official records, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24, pp. 241-253, (2014)
[25]  
Farrington D.P., West D.J., The Cambridge study in delinquent development (United Kingdom), Prospective longitudinal research, pp. 137-145, (1981)
[26]  
Farrington D.P., West D.J., The Cambridge study in delinquent development: A long-term follow-up of 411 London males, Kriminalitat:Personlichkeit, lebensgeschichte und verhalten (Criminality: Personality, behavior and life history), pp. 115-138, (1990)
[27]  
Gibson H.B., The measurement of parental attitudes and their relation to boys’ behaviour, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, pp. 233-239, (1968)
[28]  
Gibson H.B., Hanson R., West D.J., A questionnaire measure of neuroticism using a shortened scale derived from the cornell medical index, British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 6, pp. 129-136, (1967)
[29]  
Goldberg D.P., The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire, (1972)
[30]  
Hedges L.V., Hedberg E.C., Intraclass correlations for planning group randomized experiments in rural education, Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22, pp. 1-15, (2007)