Intergenerational Similarities in Risk Factors for Offending

被引:27
作者
Farrington D.P. [1 ]
Ttofi M.M. [1 ]
Crago R.V. [1 ]
Coid J.W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Criminology, Cambridge University, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge
[2] Violence Prevention Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Garrod Building, Turner St., London
关键词
Intergenerational; Longitudinal; Offending; Risk factors;
D O I
10.1007/s40865-015-0005-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The main aim of this article is to investigate to what extent the relationships between risk factors and offending by males are similar from one generation to the next. Methods: The Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development is a prospective longitudinal survey of 411 London males who were originally studied at age 8. This article compares these males (generation 2 or G2) with their biological parents (generation 1 or G1) and biological children (generation 3 or G3). Ninety-four per cent of G2 males were interviewed at age 32, while 85 % of G3 males were interviewed at an average age of 25. Results: Up to age 21, 34 % of G2 males were convicted, compared with 20 % of G3 males. Eleven risk factors were significant predictors of both G2 and G3 offending: a convicted father and mother, harsh discipline, poor parental supervision, a disrupted family, low family income, large family size, poor housing, low school attainment, daring/risk-taking and antisocial child behaviour. The findings were markedly different for only three risk factors: parental conflict, low social class and hyperactivity/attention problems. Over 20 risk factors, G2 effect sizes correlated.80 with G3 effect sizes. Conclusions: G2 results were similar to G3 results. While risk factors were not exactly comparable between generations, most of the findings in one generation were replicated in the next generation. © 2015, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 62
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Bailey J.A., Hill K.G., Oesterle S., Hawkins J.D., Parenting practices and problem behavior across three generations: monitoring, harsh discipline, and drug use in the intergenerational transmission of externalizing behavior, Developmental Psychology, 45, pp. 1214-1226, (2009)
[2]  
Belsky J., Conger R., Capaldi D.M., The intergenerational transmission of parenting: introduction to the special section, Developmental Psychology, 45, pp. 1201-1204, (2009)
[3]  
Bijleveld C.C.J.H., Farrington D.P., Editorial: the importance of studies of intergenerational transmission of antisocial behaviour, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 19, pp. 77-79, (2009)
[4]  
Capaldi D.M., Conger R.D., Hops H., Thornberry T.P., Introduction to special section on three-generation studies, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, pp. 123-125, (2003)
[5]  
Capaldi D.M., Pears K.C., Patterson G.R., Owen C.D., Continuity of parenting practices across generations in an at-risk sample: a prospective comparison of direct and mediated associations, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, pp. 127-142, (2003)
[6]  
Cohen P., Slomkowski C., Robins L.N., Historical and geographical influences on psychopathology, (1999)
[7]  
Donner A., Birkett N., Buck C., Randomization by cluster, American Journal of Epidemiology, 114, pp. 906-914, (1981)
[8]  
Elder G.H., The life course as developmental theory, Child Development, 69, pp. 1-12, (1998)
[9]  
Elliott D.S., Huizinga D., Menard S., Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems, (1989)
[10]  
Farrington D.P., Later adult life outcomes of offenders and non-offenders, Children at risk: Assessment, longitudinal research, and intervention, pp. 220-244, (1989)