Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

被引:21
作者
Jennifer Maranki
Paul Yeaton
机构
[1] Temple University School of Medicine,
[2] Carilion Virginia Tech School of Medicine,undefined
关键词
Post-ERCP pancreatitis; ERCP; Pancreatitis; Complications; Prevention; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Management; Stents; Indomethacin;
D O I
10.1007/s11894-013-0352-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pancreatitis is one of the most common complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been identified to risk-stratify patients. Several measures can be undertaken in order to decrease the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk groups. These measures include pancreatic duct stenting and rectal indomethacin, amongst others.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 223 条
[1]  
Cotton PB(2009)Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years Gastrointest Endosc 70 80-88
[2]  
Garrow DA(2006)Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 101 139-147
[3]  
Gallagher J(2009)Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 104 31-40
[4]  
Cheng CL(1998)Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 48 1-10
[5]  
Sherman S(2012)Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 22 567-586
[6]  
Watkins JL(1991)Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus Gastrointest Endosc 37 383-393
[7]  
Wang P(2013)Models of acute and chronic pancreatitis Gastroenterology 144 1180-1193
[8]  
Li ZS(2001)Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study Gastrointest Endosc 54 425-434
[9]  
Liu F(1996)Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy N Engl J Med 335 909-918
[10]  
Loperfido S(2001)Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study Am J Gastroenterol 96 417-423