Options for Enhanced Anaerobic Digestion of Waste and Biomass—a Review

被引：15

作者：

Vats N. ^{[1
]}

Khan A.A. ^{[1
]}

Ahmad K. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi

来源：

Khan, Abid Ali (akhan23@jmi.ac.in) | 1600年 / Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH卷 / 45期

关键词：

Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Co-digestion; Pre-treatment; Substrate;

D O I：

10.1007/s42853-019-00040-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Introduction: Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising technology because it is economically feasible, environmentally friendly, and socially acceptable. Moreover, biogas generation from organic waste is considered to be the future of bio-energy. Purpose: In this paper, we review the substrates available for biogas production, different methods for improvement of AD processes (two-stage anaerobic digestion and digestate recirculation) and various pre-treatment techniques used to enhance biogas generation. Method: Two-stage digestion and co-digestion of two or more substrates appear to be promising techniques for enhanced anaerobic digestion. These techniques could help to maintain the nutrient balance in a system without the further addition of nutrients, in addition to enhancing biogas generation. Results: Pre-treatment of various substrates is mainly used to increase the hydrolysis rate and thus enhance the efficiency of AD processes. © 2020, The Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery.

引用

页码：1 / 15

页数：14

共 69 条

[31]

Han G., Deng J., Zhang S., Bicho P., Wu Q., Effect of steam explosion treatment on characteristics of wheat straw, Industrial Crops and Products, 31, 1, pp. 28-33, (2010)

[32]

Harun R., Jason W.S.Y., Cherrington T., Danquah M.K., Exploring alkaline pre-treatment of microalgal biomass for bioethanol production, Applied Energy, 88, 10, pp. 3464-3467, (2011)

[33]

Jung H., Kim J., Lee C., Continuous anaerobic co-digestion of Ulva biomass and cheese whey at varying substrate mixing ratios: different responses in two reactors with different operating regimes, Bioresource Technology, 221, pp. 366-374, (2016)

[34]

Kafle G.K., Kim S.H., Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation, Applied Energy, 103, pp. 61-72, (2013)

[35]

Kalamaras S.D., Kotsopoulos T.A., Anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure and alternative crops for the substitution of maize in South Europe, Bioresource Technology, 172, pp. 68-75, (2014)

[36]

Kaparaju P., Rintala J., Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43, 2, pp. 175-188, (2005)

[37]

Karthikeyan O.P., Visvanathan C., Effect of C/N ratio and ammonia-N accumulation in a pilot-scale thermophilic dry anaerobic digester, Bioresource Technology, 113, pp. 294-302, (2012)

[38]

Lee D.Y., Ebie Y., Xu K.Q., Li Y.Y., Inamori Y., Continuous H<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> production from high-solid food waste in the two-stage thermophilic fermentation process with the recirculation of digester sludge, Bioresource Technology, 101, 1, pp. S42-S47, (2010)

[39]

Li R., Chen S., Li X., Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cattle manure for methane production, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 31, 20, pp. 1848-1856, (2009)

[40]

Li C., Champagne P., Anderson B.C., Effects of ultrasonic and thermo-chemical pre-treatments on methane production from fat, oil and grease (FOG) and synthetic kitchen waste (KW) in anaerobic co-digestion, Bioresource Technology, 130, pp. 187-197, (2013)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →