The relationship of changes in EORTC QLQ-C30 scores to ratings on the Subjective Significance Questionnaire in men with localized prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
G. Rodrigues
A. Bezjak
D. Osoba
P. Catton
D. Tsuji
D. Taylor
P. Warde
机构
[1] London Regional Cancer Centre,Department of Radiation Oncology
[2] University Health Network,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital
[3] QOL Consulting,undefined
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2004年 / 13卷
关键词
Health-related quality of life; Prostate cancer; QLQ-C30; Questionnaires; SSQ; Variance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To examine the relationship between changes in health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) on the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), and patients' perceptions of HRQOL changes as measured by the Subjective Significance Questionnaire (SSQ). Patients and methods: A total of 101 patients completed the QLQ-C30 on weeks 1, 4 and 7 of radical external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for localized cancer of the prostate. Patients rated their change in physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and overall/global quality of life (QOL) by completing a seven-category SSQ at weeks 4 and 7. The association between changes in the QLQ-C30 change and the corresponding SSQ ratings were determined by calculation of mean change scores for each SSQ category and by Spearman rank correlation coefficient analysis. Results: Patients' completion of the QLQ-C30 and SSQ exceeded 95%. Statistically significant changes in fatigue, pain, appetite, diarrhea, and global QOL scores were detected during RT. For patients reporting ‘a little’ change in global QOL on the SSQ, absolute mean QLQ-C30 change scores ranged between 0 to 15 points with 12/16 mean change scores between 2.5 and 8.5 points. In the entire study sample, correlations between SSQ patient ratings and QLQ-C30 change scores were lower than previously reported, ranging between 0.15 and 0.24 for the four different domains, but were higher when QOL scores producing ceiling effects were omitted. Conclusion: The SSQ and QLQ-C30 may measure related concepts that could assist in the interpretation of changes in scores and in the calibration of the QLQ-C30. However, the nature of this relationship could not be elucidated in this data set because of a lack of variance in HRQOL scores in the study sample. Further investigation should be carried out in study samples with sufficient variance to allow more robust conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1246
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Nelson EC(1989)The measurement of health status in clinical practice Med Care 27 S77-S90
[2]  
Berwick DM.(1993)Reliability and validity of a quality of life questionnaire in cancer patients Eur J Cancer 29 S63-S69
[3]  
Ballatori E(1993)The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365-376
[4]  
Roila F(1993)The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer: Approach to quality of life assessment: Guidelines for developing questionnaire modules. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life Qual Life Res 2 287-295
[5]  
Basurto C(1993)A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Qual Life Res 2 319-325
[6]  
Aaronson NK(1994)Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer Qual Life Res 3 353-364
[7]  
Ahmedzai S(1993)Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses Qual Life Res 2 129-140
[8]  
Bergman B(1993)Interpretation of quality of life changes Qual Life Res 2 221-226
[9]  
Sprangers MA(1989)Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Control Clin Trials 10 407-415
[10]  
Cull A(1994)Determining a minimal important change in a disease specific quality of life questionnaire J Clin Epidemiol 47 81-87