Farms and forests: evaluating the biodiversity benefits of kelp aquaculture

被引:0
作者
Hunter Forbes
Victor Shelamoff
Wouter Visch
Cayne Layton
机构
[1] University of Tasmania,Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
[2] University of Tasmania,Centre for Marine Socioecology
来源
Journal of Applied Phycology | 2022年 / 34卷
关键词
Artificial habitat; Afforestation; Ecosystem services; Macroalgae; Restoration; Seaweed;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The biodiversity benefits of kelp aquaculture and afforestation are increasingly acclaimed as the industry continues to grow and develop globally, however, whether farmed kelp can provide this ecosystem service remains unclear. Using peer-reviewed literature, we evaluated whether kelp farms provide biodiversity benefits, and identified only 23 studies that discussed the effects of kelp aquaculture on biodiversity, half of which were broad reviews that only assessed the concept of ‘biodiversity’ peripherally (e.g. did not focus on specific responses or taxa). There is also a general lack of experimental research on the topic. Based on the evidence, it seems that kelp farms can create habitat via changes to the local environment, particularly through the provision of structure and changed nutrient cycling. While this can lead to increased abundance and diversity among certain taxa (e.g. fouling organisms), it seems that kelp farms typically create novel habitats that support distinct communities not equivalent to natural kelp forests. Moreover, the potential for kelp farms to support biodiversity depends on a range of operational factors, many of which may be at odds with farming objectives that require the harvest and removal of the habitat that farms provide. While more work needs to be done to address the complexity of comparisons between kelp farms and forests, especially at appropriate experimental scales, it currently seems unlikely that kelp farms will act as kelp forests and deliver meaningful biodiversity outcomes. We should instead recognise farms for providing their own valuable services and support restoration and conservation practices of kelp forests to pursue biodiversity outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:3059 / 3067
页数:8
相关论文
共 243 条
  • [1] Amano T(2021)Tapping into non-English-language science for the conservation of global biodiversity PLoS Biol 19 e3001296-353
  • [2] Berdejo-Espinola V(2021)Testing the climate intervention potential of ocean afforestation using the Great Atlantic Nat Commun 12 2556-207
  • [3] Christie AP(2020) Belt Bot Mar 63 341-56
  • [4] Bach LT(2022)Technical challenges for offshore cultivation of kelp species: lessons learned and future directions Ecosyst Serv 53 101396-683
  • [5] Tamsitt V(2022)Sustainable growth of non-fed aquaculture can generate valuable ecosystem benefits Rev Fish Biol Fish 32 189-406
  • [6] Gower J(2015)Ocean resource use: building the coastal blue economy Mar Freshwat Res 67 47-2146
  • [7] Hurd CL(2022)The ‘Great Southern Reef’: social, ecological and economic value of Australia’s neglected kelp forests Nat Ecol Evol 6 675-1694
  • [8] Raven JA(2017)Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems Eur J Phycol 52 391-35
  • [9] Boyd PW(2019)Seaweed production: overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity Front Mar Sci 6 107-84
  • [10] Bak UG(2020)The environmental risks associated with the development of seaweed farming in Europe - prioritizing key knowledge gaps J Appl Phycol 32 2133-207