NetMHCcons: a consensus method for the major histocompatibility complex class I predictions

被引:0
作者
Edita Karosiene
Claus Lundegaard
Ole Lund
Morten Nielsen
机构
[1] Technical University of Denmark,Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology
来源
Immunogenetics | 2012年 / 64卷
关键词
MHC class I; T cell epitope; MHC binding specificity; Peptide–MHC binding; Consensus methods; Artificial neural network;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A key role in cell-mediated immunity is dedicated to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules that bind peptides for presentation on the cell surface. Several in silico methods capable of predicting peptide binding to MHC class I have been developed. The accuracy of these methods depends on the data available characterizing the binding specificity of the MHC molecules. It has, moreover, been demonstrated that consensus methods defined as combinations of two or more different methods led to improved prediction accuracy. This plethora of methods makes it very difficult for the non-expert user to choose the most suitable method for predicting binding to a given MHC molecule. In this study, we have therefore made an in-depth analysis of combinations of three state-of-the-art MHC–peptide binding prediction methods (NetMHC, NetMHCpan and PickPocket). We demonstrate that a simple combination of NetMHC and NetMHCpan gives the highest performance when the allele in question is included in the training and is characterized by at least 50 data points with at least ten binders. Otherwise, NetMHCpan is the best predictor. When an allele has not been characterized, the performance depends on the distance to the training data. NetMHCpan has the highest performance when close neighbours are present in the training set, while the combination of NetMHCpan and PickPocket outperforms either of the two methods for alleles with more remote neighbours. The final method, NetMHCcons, is publicly available at www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetMHCcons, and allows the user in an automatic manner to obtain the most accurate predictions for any given MHC molecule.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 186
页数:9
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [1] Bui HH(2005)Automated generation and evaluation of specific MHC binding predictive tools: ARB matrix applications Immunogenetics 57 304-314
  • [2] Sidney J(2011)HLArestrictor—a tool for patient-specific predictions of HLA restriction elements and optimal epitopes within peptides Immunogenetics 63 43-55
  • [3] Peters B(2010)Interdisciplinary analysis of HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses against variant epitopes reveals restricted TCR promiscuity J Immunol 184 5383-5391
  • [4] Sathiamurthy M(2009)NetMHCpan, a method for MHC class I binding prediction beyond humans Immunogenetics 61 1-13
  • [5] Sinichi A(2008)Efficient peptide-MHC-I binding prediction for alleles with few known binders Bioinformatics 24 358-366
  • [6] Purton KA(2006)Learning MHC I–peptide binding Bioinformatics 22 e227-e235
  • [7] Mothe BR(2008)Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research BMC Immunol 9 8-318
  • [8] Chisari FV(2010)Major histocompatibility complex class I binding predictions as a tool in epitope discovery Immunology 130 309-819
  • [9] Watkins DI(2006)A consensus epitope prediction approach identifies the breadth of murine T(CD8+)-cell responses to vaccinia virus Nat Biotechnol 24 817-1017
  • [10] Sette A(2003)Reliable prediction of T-cell epitopes using neural networks with novel sequence representations Protein Sci 12 1007-213