Local resection of the stomach for gastric cancer

被引:0
作者
Shinichi Kinami
Hiroshi Funaki
Hideto Fujita
Yasuharu Nakano
Nobuhiko Ueda
Takeo Kosaka
机构
[1] Kanazawa Medical University,Department of Surgical Oncology
来源
Surgery Today | 2017年 / 47卷
关键词
Gastric cancer; Local resection; Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery; Sentinel node;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The local resection of the stomach is an ideal method for preventing postoperative symptoms. There are various procedures for performing local resection, such as the laparoscopic lesion lifting method, non-touch lesion lifting method, endoscopic full-thickness resection, and laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery. After the invention and widespread use of endoscopic submucosal dissection, local resection has become outdated as a curative surgical technique for gastric cancer. Nevertheless, local resection of the stomach in the treatment of gastric cancer in now expected to make a comeback with the clinical use of sentinel node navigation surgery. However, there are many issues associated with local resection for gastric cancer, other than the normal indications. These include gastric deformation, functional impairment, ensuring a safe surgical margin, the possibility of inducing peritoneal dissemination, and the associated increase in the risk of metachronous gastric cancer. In view of these issues, there is a tendency to regard local resection as an investigative treatment, to be applied only in carefully selected cases. The ideal model for local resection of the stomach for gastric cancer would be a combination of endoscopic full-thickness resection of the stomach using an ESD device and hand sutured closure using a laparoscope or a surgical robot, for achieving both oncological safety and preserved functions.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 659
页数:8
相关论文
共 254 条
  • [1] Songun I(2010)Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial Lancet Oncol. 11 439-449
  • [2] Putter H(2014)Randomized clinical trial comparing survival after D1 or D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer Br J Surg 101 23-31
  • [3] Kranenbarg EM(2015)Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients Gastric Cancer 18 147-158
  • [4] Sasako M(2011)Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3) Gastric Cancer 14 113-123
  • [5] van de Velde CJ(2016)Assessment of postoperative quality of life following pylorus-preserving gastrectomy and Billroth-I distal gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: results of the nationwide postgastrectomy syndrome assessment study Gastric Cancer 19 302-311
  • [6] Degiuli M(2015)Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by Postgastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multi-institutional study Gastric Cancer 18 407-416
  • [7] Sasako M(1983)Study on local resection of the tumor with preservation of the regional lymph-nodes for early gastric cancer (in Japanese) Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 18 969-978
  • [8] Ponti A(1985)Possibility of limited surgery for early gastric cancer (in Japanese) Shokakigeka. 8 15-19
  • [9] Vendrame A(1989)Surgical outcome and prospective for early gastric cancer (in Japanese) Pharma Med. 7 27-33
  • [10] Tomatis M(1999)Curative laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer: five years experience World J Surg 23 187-192