Trends towards more active introduction of drug therapy, emphasizing methotrexate and biologic agents, for juvenile idiopathic arthritis

被引:0
|
作者
Heini Pohjankoski
Hannu Kautiainen
Juhani Virta Lauri
Kari Puolakka
Vappu Rantalaiho
机构
[1] Päijät-Häme Central Hospital,Department of Pediatrics
[2] Kuopio University Hospital,Primary Health Care Unit
[3] Folkhälsan Research Center,Kela Research
[4] The Social Insurance Institution of Finland,Department of Medicine
[5] South Karelia Central Hospital,Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, and Faculty on Medicine and Health Technology
[6] Tampere University,undefined
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2020年 / 39卷
关键词
Biologic DMARDs; Conventional DMARDs; Drug therapy; Juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Methotrexate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To evaluate the drug treatment trends in patients with incident juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) in 2006–2014. In Finland, patients are entitled to a special reimbursement for medication if their condition meets certain criteria. We gathered all reimbursement decisions with the ICD-10 diagnosis of M08 for patients under 16 years of age from a nationwide register maintained by Kela, the Social Institution of Finland. A total of 2439 incident cases of JIA were identified. We surveyed their reimbursable drugs purchased for the first time for JIA upon a doctor’s prescription in 3-year cohorts (2006–2008, 2009–2011, 2012–2014). Changes of drug treatment for JIA became more active during our study years. Between 2006–2008 and 2011–2014, the introduction of methotrexate (MTX) for the first time within the first 3 months increased from 73% (2006–2008) to 90% (2011–2014) of the patients, IRR (incidence rate ratio) was 1.23 (95% CI 1.10–1.37). The use of parenteral MTX increased even more; IRR was 1.97 (95% CI 1.61–2.41). During the first 2 years of their disease, 18% of the first cohort received subcutaneous biologic agents, while the corresponding proportion in the last cohort was 31%. Biologic agents were more likely to be introduced for patients with early (3 months) MTX administration than for patients without early MTX introduction; HR (hazard ratio) 2.19 (95% CI 1.63–2.93). During the follow-up, MTX administration became more prevalent for the treatment of JIA soon after diagnosis, mostly because of the increase in the use of parenteral MTX.Key Points • The drug therapy for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis has changed during recent years. • Methotrexate, some other conventional DMARDs, and biologic DMARDs are introduced earlier.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 268
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends towards more active introduction of drug therapy, emphasizing methotrexate and biologic agents, for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (November, 10.1007/S10067-019-04702-2, 2019)
    Pohjankoski, Heini
    Kautiainen, Hannu
    Lauri, Juhani Virta
    Puolakka, Kari
    Rantalaiho, Vappu
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 39 (01) : 299 - 299
  • [2] Methotrexate in the therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Holzinger, D.
    Frosch, M.
    Foell, D.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2010, 69 (06): : 496 - +
  • [3] The risk of hospitalized infection following initiation of biologic agents versus methotrexate in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Timothy Beukelman
    Fenglong Xie
    John W. Baddley
    Lang Chen
    Melissa L. Mannion
    Kenneth G. Saag
    Jie Zhang
    Jeffrey R. Curtis
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 18
  • [4] Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: towards tailor-made treatment
    Calasan, Maja Bulatovic
    Wulffraat, Nico M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 10 (07) : 843 - 854
  • [5] Disease activity and damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: methotrexate era versus biologic era
    Gabriella Giancane
    Valentina Muratore
    Valentina Marzetti
    Neus Quilis
    Belen Serrano Benavente
    Francesca Bagnasco
    Alessandra Alongi
    Adele Civino
    Lorenzo Quartulli
    Alessandro Consolaro
    Angelo Ravelli
    Arthritis Research & Therapy, 21
  • [6] Disease activity and damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: methotrexate era versus biologic era
    Giancane, Gabriella
    Muratore, Valentina
    Marzetti, Valentina
    Quilis, Neus
    Benavente, Belen Serrano
    Bagnasco, Francesca
    Alongi, Alessandra
    Civino, Adele
    Quartulli, Lorenzo
    Consolaro, Alessandro
    Ravelli, Angelo
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2019, 21 (1)
  • [7] Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
    Choida, Varvara
    Hall-Craggs, Margaret
    Jebson, Bethany R.
    Fisher, Corinne
    Leandro, Maria
    Wedderburn, Lucy R.
    Ciurtin, Coziana
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [8] Combination therapy with methotrexate and cyclosporine A in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Ravelli, A
    Moretti, C
    Temporini, F
    Rossi, F
    Magni-Manzoni, S
    Pistorio, A
    Martini, A
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 20 (04) : 569 - 572
  • [9] The efficacy and safety profile of biologic therapy with etanercept in juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    SA Alfantaki
    S Stavrou
    A Siamopoulou-Mavridou
    Pediatric Rheumatology, 9 (Suppl 1)
  • [10] Research progress in drug therapy of juvenile idiopathic arthritis
    Zhao, Wen-Jia
    Deng, Jiang-Hong
    Li, Cai-Feng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 18 (06) : 383 - 397