Heterogeneity in the definition of delirium in ICUs and association with the intervention effect in randomized controlled trials: a meta-epidemiological study

[21] Chalhub RÁ(2002)Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in “meta-epidemiological” research Stat Med 21 1513-412

[22] Quarantini LC(2007)Multivariable modelling for meta-epidemiological assessment of the association between trial quality and treatment effects estimated in randomized clinical trials Stat Med 26 2745-605

[23] Ely EW(2020)Reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in studies of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in the critically Ill: a systematic review Crit Care Med 48 e316-857

[24] Shintani A(2021)Heterogeneity in design and analysis of ICU delirium randomized trials: a systematic review Trials 22 354-89

[25] Truman B(2004)Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group BMJ 77 24-185

[26] Thomason JWW(2016)Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates J Clin Epidemiol 352 609-175

[27] Shintani A(1998)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? The Lancet 273 408-h809

[28] Peterson JF(1995)Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 336 601-undefined

[29] Pandharipande PP(2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study BMJ 36 847-undefined

[30] Girard TD(2007)Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials Int J Epidemiol 374 86-undefined

[21] Chalhub RÁ(2002)Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in “meta-epidemiological” research Stat Med 21 1513-412

[22] Quarantini LC(2007)Multivariable modelling for meta-epidemiological assessment of the association between trial quality and treatment effects estimated in randomized clinical trials Stat Med 26 2745-605

[23] Ely EW(2020)Reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in studies of interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium in the critically Ill: a systematic review Crit Care Med 48 e316-857

[24] Shintani A(2021)Heterogeneity in design and analysis of ICU delirium randomized trials: a systematic review Trials 22 354-89

[25] Truman B(2004)Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group BMJ 77 24-185

[26] Thomason JWW(2016)Empirical evaluation of which trial characteristics are associated with treatment effect estimates J Clin Epidemiol 352 609-175

[27] Shintani A(1998)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? The Lancet 273 408-h809

[28] Peterson JF(1995)Empirical evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials JAMA 336 601-undefined

[29] Pandharipande PP(2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study BMJ 36 847-undefined

[30] Girard TD(2007)Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials Int J Epidemiol 374 86-undefined