The bipolar Choquet integral representation

被引:0
作者
Salvatore Greco
Fabio Rindone
机构
[1] University of Catania,Department of Economics and Business
[2] University of Portsmouth,Portsmouth Business School, Operations and Systems Management
来源
Theory and Decision | 2014年 / 77卷
关键词
Cumulative Prospect Theory; Gains-loss separability; bi-Weighting function; Bipolar Choquet integral; D81; C60;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cumulative Prospect Theory is the modern version of Prospect Theory and it is nowadays considered a valid alternative to the classical Expected Utility Theory. Cumulative Prospect theory implies Gain-Loss Separability, i.e., the separate evaluation of losses and gains within a mixed gamble. Recently, some authors have questioned this assumption of the theory, proposing new paradoxes where the Gain-Loss Separability is violated. We present a generalization of Cumulative Prospect Theory which does not imply Gain-Loss Separability and is able to explain the cited paradoxes. On the other hand, the new model, which we call the bipolar Cumulative Prospect Theory, genuinely generalizes the original Prospect Theory of Kahneman and Tversky, preserving the main features of the theory. We present also a characterization of the bipolar Choquet Integral with respect to a bi-capacity in a discrete setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 29
页数:28
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Abdellaoui M(2000)Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions Management Science 46 1497-1512
[2]  
Allais M.(1953)Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école Américaine Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 21 503-546
[3]  
Baltussen G(2006)Violations of cumulative prospect theory in mixed gambles with moderate probabilities Management Science 52 1288-53
[4]  
Post T(2001)Prospect theory and asset prices Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 1-92
[5]  
van Vliet P(1995)Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 73-1358
[6]  
Barberis N(2005)Three new tests of independence that differentiate models of risky decision making Management Science 51 1346-1028
[7]  
Huang M(2007)Gain-loss separability and coalescing in risky decision making Management Science 53 1016-678
[8]  
Santos T(2005)Back to the St. Petersburg paradox? Management Science 51 677-1496
[9]  
Benartzi S(2000)A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis Management Science 46 1485-669
[10]  
Thaler R(1953)Theory of capacities Annales de l’Institut Fourier 5 54-88