Advancing our understanding of religion and spirituality in the context of behavioral medicine

被引:0
作者
Crystal L. Park
Kevin S. Masters
John M. Salsman
Amy Wachholtz
Andrea D. Clements
Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher
Kelly Trevino
Danielle M. Wischenka
机构
[1] University of Connecticut,Department of Psychological Sciences
[2] University of Colorado Denver,Department of Psychology
[3] Forest University,Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine & the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake
[4] University of Massachusetts Medical School,Department of Psychiatry
[5] East Tennessee State University,Department of Psychology
[6] Brown University School of Medicine and School of Public Health,Department of Medicine and Epidemiology
[7] Weill Cornell Medicine,Department of Medicine
[8] Yeshivah University,Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2017年 / 40卷
关键词
Religion; Spirituality; Cardiovascular disease; Cancer; Substance use;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recognizing and understanding the potentially powerful roles that religiousness and spirituality (RS) may serve in the prevention and amelioration of disease, as well as symptom management and health related quality of life, significantly enhances research and clinical efforts across many areas of behavioral medicine. This article examines the knowledge established to date and suggests advances that remain to be made. We begin with a brief summary of the current knowledge regarding RS as related to three exemplary health conditions: (a) cardiovascular disease; (b) cancer; and, (c) substance abuse. We then focus on particular concerns for future investigations, emphasizing conceptual issues, possible mediators and moderators of relationships or effects, and methodology. Our discussion is framed by a conceptual model that may serve to guide and organize future investigations. This model highlights a number of important issues regarding the study of links between RS and health: (a) RS comprise many diverse constructs, (b) the mechanisms through which RS may influence health outcomes are quite diverse, and (c) a range of different types of health and health relevant outcomes may be influenced by RS. The multidimensional nature of RS and the complexity of related associations with different types of health relevant outcomes present formidable challenges to empirical study in behavioral medicine. These issues are referred to throughout our review and we suggest several solutions to the presented challenges in our summary. We end with a presentation of barriers to be overcome, along with strategies for doing so, and concluding thoughts.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 51
页数:12
相关论文
共 441 条
  • [81] Roth DL(1998)Religious activity and depression among community-dwelling elderly persons with cancer: The moderating effect of race Journal of Gerontology B: Psychological Science and Social Science 53 218-227
  • [82] Foushee HR(2002)Religious attendance and cause of death over 31 years The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 32 69-89
  • [83] Crowther M(2011)The brief RCOPE: Current psychometric status of a short measure of religious coping Religion 2 51-76
  • [84] Debnam K(2001)Religious coping among the religious: The relationships between religious coping and well-being in a national sample of Presbyterian clergy, elders, and members Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40 497-513
  • [85] Holt CL(2007)Religiousness/spirituality and health: A meaning systems perspective Journal of Behavioral Medicine 30 319-328
  • [86] Clark EM(2008)Religiousness and treatment adherence in congestive heart failure patients Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging 20 249-266
  • [87] Roth DL(2015)Religion/spirituality and health in the context of cancer: Cross-domain integration, unresolved issues, and future directions Cancer 121 3789-3794
  • [88] Southward P(2015)Intrinsic religiousness and well-being among cancer patients: the mediating role of control-related religious coping and self-efficacy for coping with cancer Journal of Behavioral Medicine 38 183-193
  • [89] Delaney C(2002)Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy—Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp) Annals of Behavioral Medicine 24 49-58
  • [90] Barrere C(2014)Measuring meaning and peace With the FACIT–Spiritual Well-Being Scale: Distinction without a difference? Psychological Assessment 26 127-137