Evaluation of cardiac output variations with the peripheral pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure ratio

被引:0
作者
Audrey Tantot
Anais Caillard
Arthur Le Gall
Joaquim Mateo
Sandrine Millasseau
Alexandre Mebazaa
Etienne Gayat
Fabrice Vallée
机构
[1] Université Paris Diderot,Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint
[2] Paris Diderot University,Louis
[3] Inria Paris-Saclay,Lariboisière, Assistance Publique
[4] Ecole Polytechnique, Hôpitaux de Paris
[5] Pulse Wave Consulting,Inserm, UMRS
来源
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2019年 / 33卷
关键词
Cardiac output; Pressure pulse analysis; Vasopressor challenges; Pulse pressure; Mean arterial pressure; PP/MAP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiac output (CO) optimisation during surgery reduces post-operative morbidity. Various methods based on pulse pressure analysis have been developed to overcome difficulties to measure accurate CO variations in standard anaesthetic settings. Several of these methods include, among other parameters, the ratio of pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure (PP/MAP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the ratio of radial pulse pressure to mean arterial pressure (ΔPPrad/MAP) could track CO variations (ΔCO) induced by various therapeutic interventions such as fluid infusions and vasopressors boluses [phenylephrine (PE), norepinephrine (NA) or ephedrine (EP)] in the operating room. Trans-oesophageal Doppler signal and pressure waveforms were recorded in patients undergoing neurosurgery. CO and PPrad/MAP were recorded before and after fluid challenges, PE, NA and EP bolus infusions as medically required during their anaesthesia. One hundred and three patients (mean age: 52 ± 12 years old, 38 men) have been included with a total of 636 sets of measurement. During fluids challenges (n = 188), a positive correlation was found between ΔPPrad/MAP and ΔCO (r = 0.22, p = 0.003). After PE (n = 256) and NA (n = 121) boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP positively tracked ΔCO (r = 0.53 and 0.41 respectively, p < 0.001). By contrast, there was no relation between ΔPPrad/MAP and ΔCO after EP boluses (r = 0.10, p = 0.39). ΔPPrad/MAP tracked ΔCO variations during PE and NA vasopressor challenges. However, after positive fluid challenge or EP boluses, ΔPPrad/MAP was not as performant to track ΔCO which could make the use of this ratio difficult in current clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:6
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Hamilton MA(2011)A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients Anesth Analg 112 1392-1402
[2]  
Cecconi M(2009)Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies–with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output Crit Care 13 201-R133
[3]  
Rhodes A(2014)Effect of a perioperative, cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy algorithm on outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized clinical trial and systematic review JAMA 311 2181-1933
[4]  
Cecconi M(1991)Normalized input impedance and arterial decay time over heart period are independent of animal size Am J Physiol 261 R126-784
[5]  
Rhodes A(2018)Pressure waveform analysis Anesth Analg 126 1930-113
[6]  
Poloniecki J(2016)Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update Ann Intensive Care 6 111-900
[7]  
Della RG(2011)Performance of cardiac output measurement derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy Br J Anaesth 106 776-1192
[8]  
Grounds RM(2011)Effect of norepinephrine dosage and calibration frequency on accuracy of pulse contour-derived cardiac output Crit Care 15 R22-757
[9]  
Pearse RM(2007)The reliability of pulse contour-derived cardiac output during hemorrhage and after vasopressor administration Anesth Analg 105 107-1551
[10]  
Harrison DA(2013)Impact of arterial load on the agreement between pulse pressure analysis and esophageal Doppler Crit Care 17 R113-281