Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two different schedules of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced solid tumors

被引:0
作者
Sandrine J. Faivre
Anthony J. Olszanski
Karin Weigang-Köhler
Hanno Riess
Roger B. Cohen
Xuejing Wang
Scott P. Myrand
Enaksha R. Wickremsinhe
Candice L. Horn
Haojun Ouyang
Sophie Callies
Karim A. Benhadji
Eric Raymond
机构
[1] Beaujon University Hospital,Department of Medical Oncology
[2] Fox Chase Cancer Center,Medizinische Klinik 5
[3] Paracelsus Medical University,Medical Department, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology
[4] Charite Campus Virchow Hospital,Division of Hematology
[5] University of Pennsylvania,Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine
[6] Lilly Corporate Center,Eli Lilly and Company
[7] Lilly France,Medical Oncology
[8] Hospital Beaujon,undefined
来源
Investigational New Drugs | 2015年 / 33卷
关键词
Oral gemcitabine prodrug; Phase I study; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacogenomics; Solid tumors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background This Phase-I-study aimed to determine the recommended Phase-II-dosing-schedule of LY2334737, an oral gemcitabine prodrug, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Pharmacokinetics, cytokeratin-18 (CK18) levels, genetic polymorphisms, and antitumor activity were additionally evaluated. Methods Patients received escalating doses of LY2334737 either every other day for 21 days (d) followed by 7 days-drug-free period (QoD-arm) or once daily for 7 days every other week (QD-arm). The 28 days-cycles were repeated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation was succeeded by a dose-confirmation phase (12 additional patients to be enrolled on the maximum tolerated dose [MTD]). Results Forty-one patients received QoD- (40–100 mg) and 32 QD-dosing (40-90 mg). On QoD, 3/9 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on the 100 mg dose (2 × G3 diarrhea, 1 × G3 transaminase increase); 1 additional DLT (G3 diarrhea) occurred during dose confirmation at 90 mg (12 patients). On QD, 1 patient each experienced DLTs on 60 mg (G3 transaminase increase) and 80 mg (G3 prolonged QTcF-interval); 2/7 patients had 3 DLTs on the 90 mg dose (diarrhea, edema, liver-failure; all G3). The MTD was established at 90 mg for the QoD-arm. Seven patients on QoD and 4 on QD achieved SD (no CR + PR). Pharmacokinetics showed a dose-proportional increase in exposure of LY2334737 and dFdC without accumulation after repeated dosing. Significant increases in CK18 levels were observed. Genetic polymorphism of the cytidine deaminase gene (rs818202) could be associated with ≥ G3 hepatotoxicity. Conclusions Both schedules displayed linear pharmacokinetics and acceptable safety profiles. The recommended dose and schedule of LY2334737 for subsequent Phase-II-studies is 90 mg given QoD for 21 day.
引用
收藏
页码:1206 / 1216
页数:10
相关论文
共 182 条
[1]  
Abbruzzese JL(1991)A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine J Clin Oncol 9 491-498
[2]  
Grunewald R(2001)Phase II clinical investigation of gemcitabine in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and window evaluation of dose rate on gemcitabine triphosphate accumulation J Clin Oncol 19 3483-3489
[3]  
Weeks EA(2003)Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma J Clin Oncol 21 3402-3408
[4]  
Gravel D(2006)Comparison of standard-dose and low-dose gemcitabine regimens in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective randomized trial J Gastroenterol 41 70-76
[5]  
Adams T(2005)A pilot study of individualized maximum repeatable dose (iMRD), a new dose finding system, of weekly gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreas cancer Pancreas 30 206-210
[6]  
Nowak B(2013)Efficacy of low-dose oral metronomic dosing of the prodrug of gemcitabine, LY2334737, in human tumor xenografts Mol Cancer Ther 12 481-490
[7]  
Mineishi S(2008)Oral administration of gemcitabine in patients with refractory tumors: a clinical and pharmacologic study Clin Cancer Res 14 3477-3486
[8]  
Tarassoff P(1992)Metabolism and disposition of gemcitabine, and oncolytic deoxycytidine analog, in mice, rats, and dogs Drug Metab Dispos 20 849-855
[9]  
Satterlee W(2013)Gemcitabine versus modified gemcitabine: a review of several promising chemical modifications Mol Pharm 10 430-444
[10]  
Raber MN(2009)Synthesis, crystallization, and biological evaluation of an orally active prodrug of gemcitabine J Med Chem 52 6958-6961