Economic potential of site-specific pesticide application scenarios with direct injection and automatic application assistant in northern Germany

被引:0
作者
Sandra Rajmis
Isabella Karpinski
Jan-Philip Pohl
Marco Herrmann
Hella Kehlenbeck
机构
[1] Julius Kühn Institute,Center for Technology and Society
[2] Institute for Strategies and Technology Assessment,undefined
[3] TU Berlin,undefined
[4] Julius Kühn Institute,undefined
[5] Institute for Application Techniques in Plant Protection,undefined
[6] Central Institute for Decision Support Systems in Crop Protection,undefined
来源
Precision Agriculture | 2022年 / 23卷
关键词
Sustainable crop production; Site-specific pesticide applications; Assistance system; Economic assessment; Scenario analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A growing and promising sector of precision agriculture is the site-specific application of pesticides, having a high potential for reductions in pesticide use. Within the research project ‘AssSys’, site-specific pesticide applications with a direct injection sprayer system and an automatic application assistant were evaluated economically with respect to herbicide and fungicide applications. The application assistant aims to support farmers in decision-making and implementation of site-specific pesticide applications either in the planning stage or as ex-post analysis. The economic assessment was based on field trials and scenario analysis referring to a model farm. The field trials were conducted in 2018 and 2019 in northern Germany. In the scenario analysis, two site-specific application scenarios were compared to conventional uniform treatment (100% of the field area). Weed monitoring was conducted as (1) standard procedure according to integrated pest management, (2) camera-based and (3) drone-based in the field trials. The pesticide application costs include pesticide costs, labour and machine costs of monitoring and pesticide applications. Investment costs of the necessary technical equipment for site-specific applications were included as annual labour and machine costs. As a major key performance indicator of partial budgeting at field level, extended gross margins were calculated. The economic scenario analysis showed pesticide application cost savings from 26 to 66% for site-specific applications compared to conventional applications. The average extended gross margin for site-specific applications of 787 € ha−1 compared to 631 € ha−1 for conventional application showed a clear economic advantage of the site-specific application scenarios. Site-specific pesticide applications can support farmers in implementing precise, sustainable and economically beneficial pesticide management. The technology presented may contribute to meet the goals of the European Green Deal to reduce use and risks of pesticides.
引用
收藏
页码:2063 / 2088
页数:25
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Adrian AM(2005)Producers’ perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologies Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 48 256-271
[2]  
Norwood SH(2020)Acht von zehn Bauern setzen bereits digitale Techniken ein (Eight out of ten farmers already use digital techniques) Länderberichte 19 15-16
[3]  
Mask PL(2021)Kicking the habit: What makes and breaks farmers' intentions to reduce pesticide use? Ecological Economics 180 106868-52
[4]  
Bakker L(2003)Using site-specific weed management for control of wild oats in Spain: An economic evaluation Precision Agriculture 4 47-1215
[5]  
Sok J(2015)Eight principles of integrated pest management Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35 1199-387
[6]  
van der Werf W(2004)Precision agriculture and sustainability Precision Agriculture 5 359-241
[7]  
Bianchi FJJA(2009)Site-specific weed control technologies Weed Research 49 233-148
[8]  
Barroso J(2006)Variable-rate fungicide spraying in cereals using a plant cover sensor Precision Agriculture 7 137-442
[9]  
Fernandez-Quintanilla C(2009)Variable-rate fungicide spraying in real time by combining a plant cover sensor and a decision support system Precision Agriculture 10 431-335
[10]  
Maxwell B(2019)Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment Annual Review of Resource Economics 11 313-392