Epidemiology of patient monitoring alarms in the neonatal intensive care unit (vol 38, pg 1030, 2018)

被引:0
作者
Li, Taibo [1 ]
Matsushima, Minoru [1 ,2 ]
Timpson, Wendy [3 ]
Young, Susan [3 ]
Miedema, David [3 ]
Gupta, Munish [3 ]
Heldt, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Inst Med Engn & Sci, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Nihon Kohden Innovat Ctr, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Neonatol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41372-018-0170-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To characterize the rate of monitoring alarms by alarm priority, signal type, and developmental age in a Level-IIIB Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) population. Study design Retrospective analysis of 2,294,687 alarm messages from Philips monitors in a convenience sample of 917 NICU patients, covering 12,001 patient-days. We stratified alarm rates by alarm priority, signal type, postmenstrual age (PMA) and birth weight (BW), and reviewed and adjudicated over 21,000 critical alarms. Results Of all alarms, 3.6% were critical alarms, 55.0% were advisory alarms, and 41.4% were device alerts. Over 60% of alarms related to oxygenation monitoring. The average alarm rate (+/- SEM) was 177.1 +/- 4.9 [median: 135.9; IQR: 89.2-213.3] alarms/patient-day; the medians varied significantly with PMA and BW (p < 0.001) in U-shaped patterns, with higher rates at lower and higher PMA and BW. Based on waveform reviews, over 99% of critical arrhythmia alarms were deemed technically false. Conclusions The alarm burden in this NICU population is very significant; the average alarm rate significantly under-represents alarm rates at low and high PMA and BW. Virtually all critical arrhythmia alarms were artifactual.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1124
页数:1
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Li TB, 2018, J PERINATOL, V38, P1030, DOI 10.1038/s41372-018-0095-x