Core needle biopsy of soft tissue tumors, CEUS vs US guided: a pilot study

被引:15
作者
Coran A. [1 ]
Di Maggio A. [2 ]
Rastrelli M. [3 ]
Alberioli E. [1 ]
Attar S. [1 ]
Ortolan P. [1 ]
Bortolanza C. [1 ]
Tosi A. [4 ]
Montesco M.C. [4 ]
Bezzon E. [2 ]
Rossi C.R. [3 ]
Stramare R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radiology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua
[2] Oncological Radiology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua
[3] Melanoma and Soft tissue Sarcoma Group, Veneto Oncological Institute IOV-IRCCS, Padua
[4] Pathology Unit, Veneto Oncological Institute IOV-IRCSS, Padua
关键词
Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; Core needle biopsy; Soft tissue tumors;
D O I
10.1007/s40477-015-0161-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the bioptic sampling of soft tissue tumors (STT) compared with unenhanced ultrasonography alone. Methods: This is a prospective longitudinal study of 40 patients subjected to ultrasonography (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) to characterize a suspected STT. Three series of bioptic samplings were carried out on each patient, respectively using unenhanced US alone and CEUS in both the areas of the tumor enhanced or not by the contrast medium. All bioptic samples underwent a histological evaluation and the results were analyzed by comparing the histology of the biopsy with the definitive diagnosis in 15 surgically excised samples. Results: 27 (67.5 %) of the 40 patients completed the entire study procedure; in 19 cases (70.3 %) the three bioptic samplings gave unanimous results, also when compared to the surgical specimen; in seven cases (25.9 %) use of CEUS allowed to obtain additional or more accurate information about the mass in question, compared to simple US guidance without contrast; in one patient (3.7 %) sampling obtained using unenhanced ultrasonography guidance and in the areas enhanced by the contrast agent had precisely the same results of the surgical specimen. Conclusions: CEUS, due to its ability to evaluate microvascular areas, has proven to be a promising method in guiding bioptic sampling of soft tissue tumor, directing the needle to the most significant areas of the tumor. Given the small number of patients evaluated in our study, to achieve statistically significant results, it would be appropriate to obtain a larger sample size, since the very first results seem to be encouraging and to justify the increase of the population. © 2015, Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 342
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Doyle L.A., Nascimento A.F., Soft tissue tumors. Essentials of anatomic pathology, 3rd edn, pp 995–1045, (2011)
[2]  
Fletcher C.D., Krishnan K, (2002)
[3]  
De Vita V.T., Hellman S., Rosenberg S.A., Cancer: Principles and practice of oncology, pp. 1841-1891, (2001)
[4]  
Grimer R.J., Size matters for sarcomas, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 88, pp. 519-524, (2006)
[5]  
Iyer V.K., Cytology of soft tissue tumors: benign soft tissue tumors including reactive, non-neoplastic lesions, J Cytol, 25, pp. 81-86, (2008)
[6]  
Shidham V.B., Acker S.M., Hackbarth D.A., et al, (2012)
[7]  
Cai W., Chen X., Multimodality molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis, J Nucl Med, 49, pp. 113S-128S, (2008)
[8]  
Lassau N., Lamuraglia M., Leclere J., Et al., Functional and early evaluation of treatment in oncology: interest of ultrasonographic contrast agents, J Radiol, 85, pp. 704-712, (2004)
[9]  
Lassau N., Koscielny S., Opolon P., Et al., Evaluation of contrast enhanced color Doppler ultrasound for the quantification of angiogenesis in vivo, Invest Radiol, 36, pp. 50-55, (2001)
[10]  
Kissin M.W., Fisher C., Carter R.L., Et al., Value of Tru-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours, Br J Surg, 73, pp. 742-744, (1986)