A computational method for prioritizing targeted therapies in precision oncology: performance analysis in the SHIVA01 trial

被引:0
作者
Istvan Petak
Maud Kamal
Anna Dirner
Ivan Bieche
Robert Doczi
Odette Mariani
Peter Filotas
Anne Salomon
Barbara Vodicska
Vincent Servois
Edit Varkondi
David Gentien
Dora Tihanyi
Patricia Tresca
Dora Lakatos
Nicolas Servant
Julia Deri
Pauline du Rusquec
Csilla Hegedus
Diana Bello Roufai
Richard Schwab
Celia Dupain
Istvan T. Valyi-Nagy
Christophe Le Tourneau
机构
[1] Semmelweis University,Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
[2] University of Illinois at Chicago,Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences
[3] Oncompass Medicine,Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i)
[4] Institute Curie,Pharmacogenomics unit
[5] Institut Curie,Department of Biopathology
[6] Institut Curie,Department of Radiology
[7] Institut Curie,Translational Research Department
[8] Institut Curie,undefined
[9] INSERM U900 Research Unit,undefined
[10] Central Hospital of Southern Pest—National Institute for Hematology and Infectious Diseases,undefined
[11] Paris-Saclay University,undefined
来源
npj Precision Oncology | / 5卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Precision oncology is currently based on pairing molecularly targeted agents (MTA) to predefined single driver genes or biomarkers. Each tumor harbors a combination of a large number of potential genetic alterations of multiple driver genes in a complex system that limits the potential of this approach. We have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computational method, the digital drug-assignment (DDA) system, to prioritize potential MTAs for each cancer patient based on the complex individual molecular profile of their tumor. We analyzed the clinical benefit of the DDA system on the molecular and clinical outcome data of patients treated in the SHIVA01 precision oncology clinical trial with MTAs matched to individual genetic alterations or biomarkers of their tumor. We found that the DDA score assigned to MTAs was significantly higher in patients experiencing disease control than in patients with progressive disease (1523 versus 580, P = 0.037). The median PFS was also significantly longer in patients receiving MTAs with high (1000+ <) than with low (<0) DDA scores (3.95 versus 1.95 months, P = 0.044). Our results indicate that AI-based systems, like DDA, are promising new tools for oncologists to improve the clinical benefit of precision oncology.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Peták I(2010)Integrating molecular diagnostics into anticancer drug discovery Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9 523-535
[2]  
Schwab R(2019)Molecular profiling in precision medicine oncology Nat. Med. 25 711-712
[3]  
Orfi L(2019)Long-term overall survival and prognostic score predicting survival: the IMPACT study in precision medicine J. Hematol. Oncol. 12 145-595
[4]  
Kopper L(2017)High-throughput genomics and clinical outcome in hard-to-treat advanced cancers: results of the MOSCATO 01 trial Cancer Discov. 7 586-1334
[5]  
Kéri G(2015)Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial Lancet Oncol. 16 1324-1902
[6]  
Le Tourneau C(2018)A framework to rank genomic alterations as targets for cancer precision medicine: the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) Ann. Oncol. 29 1895-209
[7]  
Borcoman E(2019)Efficacy of molecularly targeted agents given in the randomised trial SHIVA01 according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets Eur. J. Cancer 121 202-D947
[8]  
Kamal M(2019)COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer Nucleic Acids Res. 47 D941-93
[9]  
Tsimberidou AM(2020)Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes Nature 578 82-750
[10]  
Massard C(2019)Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study Nat. Med. 25 744-3031