Leaf optical properties during and after drought stress in triticale and maize genotypes differing in drought tolerance

被引:0
作者
Maciej T. Grzesiak
Władysław Filek
Tomasz Hura
Maciej Kocurek
Jan Pilarski
机构
[1] Polish Academy of Sciences,The F. Górski Institute of Plant Physiology
[2] Cracow Agricultural University,Department of Plant Physiology
来源
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum | 2010年 / 32卷
关键词
Drought; Maize; Triticale; Optical properties; Water potential; Leaf injury; Chlorophyll content;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of a short (7 days) and prolonged (14 days) soil drought (D) on leaf optical properties (R reflectance, T transmittance and A absorbance) in PAR and NIR range of irradiation, and on changes in leaf water potential (ψ), leaf injury index (LI), leaf thickness (LT) and chlorophyll (a + b) content (Chl) was studied for maize and triticale genotypes differing in drought tolerance. Under control conditions (C) leaves of maize in comparison to triticale were better hydrated, were thicker and had higher content of chlorophyll (a + b). In non-stressed plants, small differences were observed in measurements of R, T and A. In the range from 500 to 600 nm, the differences between D-resistant and D-sensitive were observed only in transmittance (T) and in range from 700 to 1,100 nm in absorbance (A). In genotypes belonging to the group of D-sensitive T in PAR range and A in NIR range were two times higher than in D-resistant ones. However, in NIR range R for D-sensitive genotypes was lower than for D-resistant ones. The drought stress caused the decrease in ψ, Chl, LT and the increase in leaf injury index (LI). Soil drought applied within 14 days caused larger changes in these physiological characters in comparison to 7 days drought. The observed harmful influence of drought was more visible for maize than triticale. Moreover for genotypes belonging to D-sensitive ones, changes were larger than for D-resistant ones. Similar to changes in ψ, LT and LI drought stress caused changes in leaf optical properties parameters R, A and T. In the PAR range, the highest changes were observed in R, whereas changes in T and A, which were not considerable. Both in maize and triticale, increase in R was higher in plants subjected to 14 days drought than in plants exposed to drought for 7 days. In maize, increase in R was larger for D-sensitive genotype. For both species, changes in T and A of PAR range were small. In NIR range, an increase in R and A, and decrease in T were observed. After 7 days of recovery in plants subjected to shorter period of drought significant differences were still visible in most cases. The same was observed for ψ, LT, LI and Chl parameters. It shows that the period of 7 days rehydration is too short to remove the injuries caused by drought stress. This results indicate that measurements of R, T and A might be useful in practical application for the estimation of the drought tolerance level. Some limitations in the practical application for plant breeding may be caused by relatively high cost of necessary equipment.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 442
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[21]  
Percy KE(1985)Differences in the physiological state between triticale and maize plants during drought stress and followed rehydration expressed by the leaf gas exchange and spectrofluorimetric methods Maydica 30 361-370
[22]  
Czarnowski M(2005)Effect of long-term drought stress on leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters in C3 and C4 plants Acta Physiol Plant 27 183-192
[23]  
Cebula S(1997)Variability in leaf optical properties among 26 species from a broad range of habitants Photosynthesis 33 347-369
[24]  
Czarnowski M(2005)Differences in drought resistance between two corn hybrids. II: component analysis and growth rates Acta Physiol Plant 27 173-182
[25]  
Starzecki W(1984)Response of maize genotypes to drought tolerance tests Maydica 29 89-100
[26]  
Dat B(1993)The content of photosynthetic pigments and the light conditions in the fruit and leaves of sweet pepper Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44 231-251
[27]  
Fischer RA(2000)Leaf-age related differences in chlorophyll fluorescence Plant Cell Environ 23 1303-1311
[28]  
Maurer R(undefined)Optical properties and the content of photosynthetic pigments in the stems and leaves of apple tree undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[29]  
Grzesiak MT(undefined)Screening of maize genotypes using drought tolerance tests undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[30]  
Grzesiak S(undefined)Plant tissues optics undefined undefined undefined-undefined