Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: first Polish experience

被引:0
|
作者
Bizon, Magdalena [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Olszewski, Maciej [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Grabowska, Agnieszka [2 ]
Mawlichanow, Krzysztof [2 ,3 ]
Pilka, Radovan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] LUX MED Oncol Hosp, Sw Wincentego 103, PL-03291 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Neohospital, Kostrzewskiego 47, Krakow, Poland
[3] Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow Univ, Krakow, Poland
[4] Palacky Univ, Univ Hosp Olomouc, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Fac, Olomouc, Czech Republic
[5] Lazarski Univ, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Robotic surgery; Endometrial cancer; Patient's preferences; Miniinvasive surgery; HYSTERECTOMY; STANDARD; OUTCOMES; TRIALS; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01752-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
In Poland, robotic surgery is nowadays perceived as a new method of surgical treatment in endometrial cancer patients. We aim to present the first Polish group of endometrial cancer patients treated using robotic surgery. The analysis was based on 79 patients with mean age of 59.72 +/- 11.709 (range 27-83) years and endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical treatment. Mean BMI was 31.38 +/- 8.78 (range 19.03-65.97) kg/m(2). The data were collected based on a questionnaire consisting of 19 questions concerning the patient's perception of robotic surgery before the procedure. Patients with a family history of neoplastic diseases indicate precision of movements as the most important reason for choosing robotic surgery (p = 0.0035). Patients after surgery procedures in the past named shorter hospitalization as a major benefit (p = 0.0037). Patients who chose robotic surgery for financial reasons stressed the cosmetic effect as a priority (p = 0.0319). Shorter length of hospital stay, less blood loss, enlarged view, and good visualization were statistically significant reasons for choosing robotic surgery (p < 0.05). Women who consider work, good material status, and well-being as the most important aspects of their lives cited the cosmetic effect as a benefit of robotic surgery (p = 0.0029 vs. p = 0.0074 vs. p = 0.01745, respectively). In the follow-up after operations, no patients regretted choosing robotic surgery. Good visualization, precise movements, less blood loss, and cosmetic effects are the most frequent reasons for choosing robotic surgery. Even patients after other types of surgery in the past decided on robot-assisted radical hysterectomy because of the clear benefits of this approach.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Computed Tomography Morphometrics and Pulmonary Intolerance in Endometrial Cancer Robotic Surgery
    Abdelbadee, Ahmed Y.
    Paspulati, Raj M.
    McFarland, Heather D.
    Bedaiwy, Mohamed A.
    Ciancibello, Leslie
    Anderson, Gina
    Zanotti, Kristine M.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (07) : 1075 - 1082
  • [32] Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial
    Maenpaa, Minna M.
    Nieminen, Kari
    Tomas, Eija I.
    Laurila, Marita
    Luukkaala, Tiina H.
    Maenpaa, Johanna U.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (05) : 588.e1 - 588.e7
  • [33] Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Robotic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
    Hopkins, Mark R.
    Richmond, Abby M.
    Cheng, Georgina
    Davidson, Susan
    Spillman, Monique A.
    Sheeder, Jeanelle
    Post, Miriam D.
    Guntupalli, Saketh R.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2014, 18 (03)
  • [34] Endometrial Cancer Surgery Costs: Robot vs Laparoscopy
    Holtz, David O.
    Miroshnichenko, Gennady
    Finnegan, Mark O.
    Chernick, Michael
    Dunton, Charles J.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 500 - 503
  • [35] Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer
    Yim, Ga Won
    Kim, Young Tae
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 24 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [36] Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer
    Corrado, G.
    Cutillo, G.
    Pomati, G.
    Mancini, E.
    Sperduti, I.
    Patrizi, L.
    Saltari, M.
    Vincenzoni, C.
    Baiocco, E.
    Vizza, E.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (08): : 1074 - 1081
  • [37] Microlaparoscopy: A further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging - Initial experience
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Cromi, Antonella
    Siesto, Gabriele
    Zefiro, Francesca
    Franchi, Massimo
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 113 (02) : 170 - 175
  • [38] Robotic surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases
    Samalavicius, Narimantas Evaldas
    Janusonis, Vinsas
    Siaulys, Raimondas
    Jasenas, Marius
    Deduchovas, Olegas
    Venckus, Raimondas
    Ezerskiene, Viktorija
    Paskeviciute, Renata
    Klimaviciute, Geda
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02) : 371 - 376
  • [39] An economic analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: Costs, charges and reimbursements to hospitals and professionals
    Venkat, Pavithra
    Chen, Lee-May
    Young-Lin, Nichole
    Kiet, Tuyen K.
    Young, Greg
    Amatori, Deborah
    Dasverma, Barnali
    Yu, Xinhua
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    Chan, John K.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (01) : 237 - 240
  • [40] Comparing oncological outcomes of robotic versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial cancer
    Nikolopoulos, Manolis
    Pickering, Mark
    Thu, Khaing Thu
    Mitsopoulos, Vasileios
    Pandraklakis, Anastasios
    Lippiatt, Jonathan
    Innamaa, Anni
    Biliatis, Ioannis
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 310 (05) : 2631 - 2637