High-resolution morphological and biochemical imaging of articular cartilage of the ankle joint at 3.0 T using a new dedicated phased array coil: in vivo reproducibility study

[1] Millington SA(2007)Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using high resolution MRI J Orthop Res 25 143-151

[2] Li B(2003)Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience J Bone Joint Surg Am 85–A 25-32

[3] Tang J(2002)Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 209-216

[4] Hangody L(2002)Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability J Orthop Res 20 249-256

[5] Fules P(2006)Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives Eur Radiol 16 1298-1307

[6] Ba-Ssalamah A(2006)Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 63-76

[7] Schibany N(2006)3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. II. Clinical applications Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 41-62

[8] Puig S(2005)Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint Eur J Radiol 55 283-288

[9] Herneth AM(2004)Small-field-of-view MRI of the knee and ankle AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 24-28

[10] Noebauer-Huhmann IM(2007)Impact of coil design on the contrast-to-noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative Magn Reson Med 57 448-454

[1] Millington SA(2007)Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using high resolution MRI J Orthop Res 25 143-151

[2] Li B(2003)Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints: ten years of experimental and clinical experience J Bone Joint Surg Am 85–A 25-32

[3] Tang J(2002)Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 16 209-216

[4] Hangody L(2002)Quantitative cartilage imaging of the human hind foot: precision and inter-subject variability J Orthop Res 20 249-256

[5] Fules P(2006)Musculoskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives Eur Radiol 16 1298-1307

[6] Ba-Ssalamah A(2006)Musculoskeletal imaging at 3T: current techniques and future applications Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 63-76

[7] Schibany N(2006)3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. II. Clinical applications Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14 41-62

[8] Puig S(2005)Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint Eur J Radiol 55 283-288

[9] Herneth AM(2004)Small-field-of-view MRI of the knee and ankle AJR Am J Roentgenol 183 24-28

[10] Noebauer-Huhmann IM(2007)Impact of coil design on the contrast-to-noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative Magn Reson Med 57 448-454