Quality of Life and Leisure Activities: How do Leisure Activities Contribute to Subjective Well-Being?

被引:0
作者
Andreja Brajša-Žganec
Marina Merkaš
Iva Šverko
机构
[1] The Ivo Pilar Institute of Social Sciences,
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2011年 / 102卷
关键词
Leisure activities; Subjective well-being; Quality of life; Age; Gender;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The quality of life is determined with objective factors and also with subjective perception of factors which influence human life. Leisure activities play a very important role in subjective well-being because they provide opportunities to meet life values and needs. Through participation in leisure activities people build social relationships, feel positive emotions, acquire additional skills and knowledge, and therefore improve their quality of life. In this report we will explore how leisure activities improve subjective well-being. We will try to distinguish among different types of leisure activities and find those which contribute more to the subjective well-being. Particularly, we will explore which leisure activities contribute to the subjective well-being of women and men of different age. Our study is based on data from a representative sample of Croatian citizens (N = 4,000), who estimated their subjective well-being and participation in various leisure activities. First, we will describe the subjective well-being of various groups of people who differ by gender and age. Afterward, we will identify important leisure activities which determine subjective well-being across age and gender groups. Overall, our results show that engagement in leisure activities contributes to subjective well being, while the pattern of important leisure activities somewhat varies across different age and gender groups.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 91
页数:10
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Auld C(1997)Social exchange processes in leisure and non-leisure settings: A review and exploratory investigation Journal of Leisure Research 29 183-200
[2]  
Case A(2003)Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index Social Indicators Research 64 159-190
[3]  
Cummins RA(1984)Subjective well-being Psychological Bulletin 95 542-575
[4]  
Eckersley R(2000)Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards need fulfilment, culture, and evaluation theory Journal of Happiness Studies 1 41-78
[5]  
Pallant J(2003)Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life Annul Review of Psychology 54 403-425
[6]  
Van Vugt J(1997)Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators Social Indicators Research 40 189-216
[7]  
Misajon R(1999)Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin 125 276-302
[8]  
Diener E(2002)A study of relationship between leisure and life satisfaction of the elderly Bulletin of the Faculty of Human Development 9 419-425
[9]  
Diener E(2002)Context and dialogue in research on women and leisure Journal of Leisure Research 34 253-271
[10]  
Lucas RE(2007)Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: What are major pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Social Indicators Research 82 233-264